I don't know, it's really unusual because the LLM could be trainedon the DMV handbook, and it will pass the test.

But that's different, because the LLM portion of the AI isn't connected to the driving AI. So you would want to devise a test that shows the car knows how to handle situations, whether it can answer them in words or not.

It's an extremely effective rhetorical technique. Conflate what is happening now with what is possible in the future, and most people will not notice the difference, even if "now" and "future" were clearly delineated in your statements (thus making your statement absolutely factual).

I know you're trying to point out contradictions in the law, but...

You're going to have a hard time convincing a judge or jury that the law should be interpreted this way.

You didn't have a nondisclosure agreement or anything?

Sam Altman is a fine, upstanding young man with not a hint of deception in his bones. He would never lie, cheat, steal, infringe copyright, engage in corporate espionage, abuse his sister, lie to the board, or anything remotely unethical. When Aaron Schwartz said that Sam Altman couldn't be trusted, of course he was being sarcastic.

You do have to take a written driving test though, which covers things like this.

Of course, an LLM could pass the written test, but you'd want to have a way to ensure that the things written in the driver's manual are things that the self-driving car can handle.

Here is Waymo's explanation of what's going on with their remote driving.

That sounds amazing, but it's still in the future.

"Education is wasted on the young."

Construction zones and first responders are not an edge case, they are a well-known case. Also, stopping for school busses.

This isn't an edge case that no one has thought of.

If you turn your brain on, you can think of other solutions. Something like, "have a safety driver."

Wow, based on this comment, you would have gotten an A in the first half of his class.

The camera feed is fake.

Again, it doesn't say why they think they were "Kremlin based hackers."

I personally tracked the IP address of an open webcam I was monitoring, and I found it was hacked by redmid17 - 1217076. I have all the proxy traceroute logs. Very suspicious.

The article doesn't say why they think it's Russians.

Taking control of a device with a default password is not really a heavy hacking task. It doesn't require nation state resources. You could probably do it yourself in an afternoon, if you were motivated.

Construction zones are not exceptions, they're a very predictable common case.