Comment Re:Monopolies are legal if the Government allows t (Score 1) 114
Monopolies have always been legal. Abusing one is not. It's literally never been against the law to be a monopoly.
Monopolies have always been legal. Abusing one is not. It's literally never been against the law to be a monopoly.
Just wait until Claude impregnates your dog while OpenAI and Grok film it for Meta to post online.
T-Mobile is on one hell of a downward spiral. It's actually impressive.
It's easy to blame Intel but that was a joint venture with Micron and Intel. IMFlash out of Lehi Utah. Micron was every bit as responsible and if I remember right still holds most of the patents.
You could even make the case it was Micron that killed it because they dumped the entire thing on Intel and sold off the Lehi fab. Without Micron sharing manufacturing costs and with scaling difficulties lagging behind traditional NAND bit density improvements, Optane became financially unviable.
Isn't limited to reddit. It's every social media site and almost every comment section online. I'm actually appreciative of the sites that don't have comment sections or require an extra click to view them these days.
Call centers have been absolute shit for 30+ years.
It took me under 3 minutes to get my Canon 702 working perfectly on Arch, while the wife's MacBook took 10x more and was a pain in the ass.
This is particularly noteworthy given that CUPS was developed by Apple. But it's still not surprising how a big company can screw things up compared to "hobby" projects.
Printing is a good example how Linux works well with standards. Traditionally, if the printer understood Postscript, you wouldn't need much of a printer driver. Meanwhile, Windows users were instructed to download a very specific driver for that printer model, even if it would just pass PS through.
Their value has already peaked. Get out now while they still have some value.
Slashdot introduced me to bitcoin in 2010 and, as a result, I turned a few hundred dollars into a few hundred thousands.
Umm.. Unlikely. $100 worth of bitcoin in 2010 (0.39) would be worth over $15M today. It would have been over $30M last October. Your claim of "a few hundred" multiplies that by some unknown amount. If you actually had $90M in bitcoin last year you wouldn't be bragging about it here.
It looks like the GP did exactly as you suggested: he got out early while he was sure the coin still had some value. Maybe he needed the money for something at the time — something he values more than money. I personally sold a considerable amount of bitcoin in the mid 2010s to buy my own apartment. I know I could have made more money by holding it, but that would have meant renting someone else's apartment, which means higher running costs and less control over my life. So I remain quite happy with this decision, even if I'm not filthy rich.
In the US, you can get about 1kw/hr on a standard plug w/o burning the breaker too hard. I've had EVs since 2011 and they've all been about 3-4miles/kw.
In Europe, we use kW for power and kWh for energy, so we count things like km per kWh.
Seriously, though, it looks like your standard outlets are fused for 10 A current, which is what we use here too. But we use double the voltage, thus doubling the power to about 2.3 kW.
I don't have much more to say about it, except that if I was a billion-dollar AI company I wouldn't try and pass off my flaws as brilliance.
The way this is being described is asinine. You lose a master and you're fucked, lose a copy and you still have the master. It's like words don't mean anything to these people. Additionally, fuck the studio for not encrypting it or exercising any sort of security on it at all.
Pretty much everyone in this story is a moron
"The limitation lies in the inclusion of copyright-significant material generated by such tools in the code submitted to GCC"
This seems like the important bit. Isn't there significant concern over whether LLM generated code can be copyrighted?
A late reply to your comment:
Yes, overall structure is a problem. I generally give it hints as to how I would like the architecture to be, and for larger projects I mention that future ability to expand/extend is important, which then makes it construct more robust "frameworks".
But generally you need to know what the bones of your solution should look like and push it in that direction otherwise you end up with nicely commented spaghetti code.
These drone delivery services that have to operate in line-of sight and comply with a gazillion FAA regulations are doomed to failure. You could deliver the order faster using a trebuchet over such distances and with fewer liabilities or costs.
Manna Aero has moved to the USA for its trials because it effectively had so many problems in it's home of Ireland and Just the other day another 85lb Amazon drone crashed and burned.
Given the costs, both from a hardware, labor and systems perspective, they'll never compete with a gig-worker on an ebike.
Doe she watch it with her boyfriend?
When a fellow says, "It ain't the money but the principle of the thing," it's the money. -- Kim Hubbard