Journal Marxist Hacker 42's Journal: I was wrong yesterday- It's not just Oregon 17
Nope- apparently supply and demand is MUCH more complex than many people think. In other words Paying Americans More Creates Jobs as opposed to the common wisdom that if you pay Americans More, you have to cut Other Americans out of your payroll to pay for the increased payroll. What does this mean? It means my main objection to a minimum wage is greatly reduced. Not eliminated- there's still the fact that for every $1 a rich person makes, somebody at the bottom of the pay scale makes only $.02- and it's the rich guy who drives inflation up, not the poor guy. But the fact that state after state after state can up their minimum wage *without* acompanying job loss takes a lot of the fear of supply and demand away. Now if we could just have a reasonable experiment with an explicit Maximum Wage- as opposed to the implicit one that was in effect when our government was paying off WWII debt between 1947 and 1960.
I guess Henry Ford was right and Bill Ford is wrong.
I guess Henry Ford was right and Bill Ford is wrong.
LOL (Score:1)
Re:LOL (Score:2)
I hope not- after all, there have been instances of our government paying off debt far more recently than that, and with lower tax rates too (Clinton and the Republican Congress in 1997-2000 paid off a ton of this country's governmental debt). But I think after Shrub the Younger, we'll need to see the 95% marginal tax bracket again to pay off his shenannagins. And that- well, it's going to happ
Re:LOL (Score:2)
No, we're not paying them all off immediately, and we keep a large accrewing amount stored up, same as any American household. (Most people have a large debt stored up, where if they lost the collateral that was backing it up, like their house, they'd be so impossibly in debt that it would make you cry.)
So, the thing here is that the US *is* making debt payments all the time. But just like the average American household we've g
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Or at least- did. A lot of the Republican plans floated for Social Security include defaulting on the loan that paid for the tax cuts. But I guess, since none of those plans have been enacted yet, it's still our policy- for now.
No, we're not paying them all off immediately, and we keep a large accrewing amount stored up, same as any American household. (Most people have a large debt stored up, where if they lost the collate
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Nah, it's worth more to them to have a debt than demand repayment. It's like a loan shark. Yeah, he wants his money back, but he's not going to destroy you over it. No, at worst he's going to make it just hurt.
Hell, same with a Bank, only they make it hurt in your wallet, instead of in the knees that are now sticking out the other side of your leg.
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Most loan sharks I know do destroy you over it when you get overextended to the point that you can no longer pay- they start with your kneecaps and move up, week after week, demanding payment until you are dead and they take whatever they can get out of your wallet.
No, at worst he's going to make it just hurt.
Already doing that- they're now
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Usually they take whatever they can from your wallet every "encounter". True, eventually the cops pull your dead blood-spattered body from a garbage bin, and the loan shark insist, "I wouldn't kill him, guy owes me money!" But when the cops fin
Re:LOL (Score:2)
And what would happen when the loan shark is a country? Do we dare even TRY to find out?
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Well, it depends on how much military force one has over the other. I mean, with us and Iraq, if you believe the "War for Oil" assertion (or are just willing to accept it long enough to discuss this point) then the US decided we were done waiting on Iraq to do what we wanted them to do, so we could get their oil. So, we walk in.
But take somewhere like... Jamaica. If we owed them lots and lots of money, there's still n
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Exactly my point. Why should China be any different? They've got nukes and could easily raise an army of a couple hundred million to kick our army's ass.
But take somewhere like
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Same world, different mythos.
Of course, from the people in Europe, you'd hear them saying that the Arabs are going to be causing havoc before China.
Someone's going to get stupid and start something eventually, but... I just refuse to believe that people are stupid enough to get killed over this stuff. Of course, at that point it's
Re:LOL (Score:2)
Of course, that's because in Europe the Arabs are ALREADY causing a great deal of havoc. It's time for another King Stanislaw- but Poland is no longer a democratic republic and no longer can produce such mettle.
Someone's going to get stupid and start something eventually, but... I just refuse to believe that people are stupid enough to get killed over this stuff. Of course, at that poi
Bush's Wimpy Economics (Score:1)
From GW Bush's Cleveland appearance, March 20, 2006 [whitehouse.gov]:
Re:Bush's Wimpy Economics (Score:2)
Either that- or they need to raise the wage to $10/hr.
Re:Bush's Wimpy Economics (Score:1)
It also teaches kids:
BTW, in my previous post, Bush was quoted mentioning an onion grower he'd met at the airport. I am willing to wager that there was no such person, and was in
Re:Bush's Wimpy Economics (Score:2)
Re:Bush's Wimpy Economics (Score:2)