Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 38 declined, 8 accepted (46 total, 17.39% accepted)

Submission + - Cold Warriors Question Nukes (wordpress.com)

Martin Hellman writes: "George Shultz served as President Reagan's Secretary of State, and Bill Perry as President Clinton's Secretary of Defense. Henry Kissinger was National Security Advisor and Secretary of State to both President Nixon and Ford. Sam Nunn was Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee for eight years. Their key roles in the Cold War has led many to call them "½ÂoeCold Warriors." That status makes their recent, repeated calls for fundamentally re-examining our nuclear posture all the more noteworthy. Their most recent attempt to awaken society to the unacceptable risk posed by nuclear weapons is an OpEd in today's Wall Street Journal Deterrence in the Age of Nuclear Proliferation. (That link requires a subscription to the Journal. There is also a subscription-free link at the Nuclear Threat Initiative.) Key excerpts and links to other resources are available."

Submission + - Risky Nuclear Designs

Martin Hellman writes: Yesterday, Slashdot reported that a system failure at Warren AFB in Wyoming affected 50 ICBM’s and that “various security protocols built into the missile delivery system, like intrusion alarms and warhead separation alarms, were offline.” Assuaging fears that America’s nuclear deterrent might have been compromised during this failure, the source article notes that the missiles still could be launched from airborne command centers. Other reports cite an administration official offering assurances that "at no time did the president's ability [to launch] decrease." Given the difficulty of debugging software and hardware that is probably not a good thing. The history of nuclear command and control systems has too many examples of risky designs that favor the ability to launch over the danger of an accidental one.

Submission + - Programmable Magnets (popularmechanics.com)

Martin Hellman writes: Popular Mechanics has given one of its Breakthrough Awards for the invention of "programmable magnets." Instead of having a single North or South pole, these clever devices have an array of North and South poles. If a matching device with exactly the same array is aligned with the first one, they will experience strong repulsion, just like two single North poles do when brought near one another. If the matching device has the complementary array (North and South interchanged), with correct alignment the two devices will attract. But a slight misalignment will cancel most of the force. Apparently other configurations are possible as well, allowing frictionless magnetic gears and exploding toys. (The exploding toys video is near the bottom right of the second linked page.) The inventor, Larry Fullerton, used techniques similar to those from CDMA modulation. (Watch the Intro video on that same, second linked page for a brief explanation. While I don't understand magnetism that well, I do understand CDMA and carrying over those ideas to magnetic arrays does make sense to me.)

Submission + - General Drops Nuclear Bombshell (wordpress.com)

Martin Hellman writes: Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Hugh Shelton, has dropped a nuclear bombshell, metaphorically speaking. Shelton’s recently released memoirs "Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior," assert that President Clinton lost a card containing key phrases needed for ordering a nuclear strike, and that the codes were missing for months. This confirms a similar allegation, made in 2004 by Lt. Col. Robert Patterson, a military aide who frequently carried the “nuclear football” during the Clinton presidency. Unfortunately, human error within the nuclear weapons complex is a frequent and dangerous occurrence.

Submission + - Hackers blind quantum cryptographers (cccure.org)

Martin Hellman writes: According to an article in Nature magazine, Quantum hackers have performed the first 'invisible' attack on two commercial quantum cryptographic systems. By using lasers on the systems — which use quantum states of light to encrypt information for transmission —" they have fully cracked their encryption keys, yet left no trace of the hack."
Power

Submission + - DAM Pops Energy Star's Bubble (deviceguru.com)

Martin Hellman writes: "Last month's Slashdot story Energy Star Program Needs an Overhaul reported on a major problem with the EPA's Energy Star program. A Sony TV that was advertised to draw less than 0.1 watts in standby mode, was actually drawing 15 watts — 150 times the stated value. A lack of information in the user manual and poor response from Sony led me to suspect the problem was with the Electronic Program Guide feature, but a lack of information in the User Guide and a lack of response from Sony made it impossible to be sure — or to turn off the EPG. At current prices, that power consumption cost me about as much as a subscription to TV Guide magazine! The EPG was not as free as the on screen instructions would have you believe.

Today's Device Guru reports the resolution of that issue. As suspected, the problem was with the EPG and there is a way to turn it off — now documented in that story. The problem is probably not unique to Sony or TV's that claim Energy Star compliance (devices are self-certified by the manufacturers!), so investing in a power meter is likely to have a good return on invesment. (Device Guru has a link to an inexpensive meter.) As a result of this waste of power, the EPA is planning for future versions of the Energy Star requirements to limit the amount of time a TV can spend in Download Acquisition Mode (DAM) as the time for acquiring the EPG is known."

Power

Submission + - Energy Star or Black Hole? (deviceguru.com)

Martin Hellman writes: "Energy Star or Black Hole?

Yesterday's DeviceGuru.com feature raises questions about the EPA's Energy Star program. For example, an Energy Star compliant TV that claims to draw 0.1 watts in sleep mode appears to do that — but only seems to sleep about 25% of the time that it is "off." The other 75% of the time it draws about 20 watts, for an effective sleep power draw of 15 watts from the user's perspective.

Based on the observations described, it is also questionable how many PC's really are sleeping when their screens are blank, even if the user has turned sleep mode on. Given the billions of dollars and tons of CO2 that are at stake, this situation demands more attention."

Encryption

Submission + - Soaring, Cryptography and Nuclear Weapons (nuclearrisk.org)

Martin Hellman writes: "What can possibly relate three topics as different as soaring, cryptography and nuclear weapons? To find out read my latest article. By approaching nuclear weapons from this less threatening perspective I hope to draw new people to this critical issue.

While best known as co-inventor (with Diffie and Merkle) of public key cryptography, I have worked for over twenty-five years to reduce the threat posed by nuclear weapons. I am also a glider pilot with over 2,600 logged hours. (Readers needing a break can go to some photos of the Sierra Nevada mountains taken from my glider."

Slashdot Top Deals

It appears that PL/I (and its dialects) is, or will be, the most widely used higher level language for systems programming. -- J. Sammet

Working...