I regret to inform you that you have woefully underestimated it. The actual retail rate offered to consumers is closer to $2200 US per gallon. Sources: internet-ink.com, cbc.ca. This $14 million fine is only worth like, seven thousand gallons, or less than 200 oil barrels of ink.
Your link proves what I said. America sends billions in no-strings cash to the Arab states that use it to kill and radicalize Americans. What Israel gets is "store credit" to US defense manufacturers who operate US factories that employ US workers. And unlike with the Arab states it's a bilateral deal that America profits from enormously on every single level.
The Arabs get billions in cash they use to bomb Israel, Raytheon gets paid to make interceptors to shoot those down, Israel gets bombed and blamed by useful idiots like you. Qatar, Russia, China, and Iran thank you for your service.
Put data center water usage on the same graph as california's sacred almond farms and the graph will be a flat line.
Our homes are designed for keeping heat in.
Insulation works both ways. If your homes are designed so well to "keep the heat in" then they'd also be incredibly efficient if air conditioned. More people die of heat in Europe than of all causes involving firearms including suicide in the United States. Europe is full of failed states with third world problems.
Solar and other so called "renewables" and "green" energy sources actually do have a mountainous toxic waste problem that leftists pretend Nuclear has.
The government doesn't "send billions to Israel", it sends money to American companies like Raytheon that employe American workers in American factories. That money never gets to Israel. America also makes money off of the relationship with tens of billions in bilateral trade every year even without considering that Israel supplies America with about 5 times as much actionable intelligence as the entire CIA or the free advertising, research, and development America benefits from.
You're thinking of the Arab states, who get billions in no-strings cash that they use to build palaces and commit terrorism against America. Hezbollah alone for example has killed hundreds of Americans.
But hey keep obsessing over the Jews. That's been a winning strategy throughout all of history.
Ok, you doubled down... but you didn't actually say anything.
Lie. I've made an explicit point ever since my first post which you've refused to even engage with in bad faith.
Why are you saying it is a "lie" that Sanger was violating the canvassing rule? Everybody agrees he was, and he doesn't deny it. He simply makes procedural arguments for why he shouldn't be called out for it.
Double down. Saying "More people should become wikipedia editors" is not canvassing. It doesn't matter if a bigoted lynch mob lies and says it is, it isn't. Truth is not a popularity contest. "Canvassing" in wikipedia terms would be Sanger explicitly soliciting people to join the website and vote in a specific way. This is why even his fellow co-founder jimbo wales explicitly called out this vote as utter horseshit.
I've made this point consistently from the start, you keep lying about what happened, lying about what I said, and doubling down on your lies every reply.
You're a typical right-winger. The only time you shout "lie" is when you're telling them.
Projection.
He doesn't even deny it, he just makes procedural arguments why he shouldn't be punished for it.
Lie
And you're either not smart enough to understand the words, or you're too much of a dingus to stick to actual arguments instead of yelling, "Squirrel!"
Double down
(The canvassing rule doesn't say that people involved in activism can't be editors. It says that people who are editors can't use activism to gain support for their edits.)
Project. In the exact way you claimed Sanger was doing in your initial lie.Literally all Sanger did was encourage more people to become wikipedia editors in general. Even Wales called out the pernicious lie that Sanger was "canvassing".
Slashdot at the link. I know because they're the ones out in the streets literally screaming about loving Hitler. If you want a cesspool go check out bluesky.
No, they didn't. He literally just said that more people should be involved in editing wikipedia. His fellow cofounder also called out the pernicious lie that he was "canvassing".
And, frankly, the entire "canvassing" argument falls flat considering wikipedia itself is essentially owned by a handful of professional organized activists.
You know how I know you don't actually believe what you're saying?
You know how I know you don't actually believe what you're saying?
Has anyone even tried?
You bought a product. That product was damaged and functionality stolen from you. We have laws against this.
Oh look, a leftist lying like they breath once again.
The Force is what holds everything together. It has its dark side, and it has its light side. It's sort of like cosmic duct tape.
