That's your choice, and I'm happy to stop subsidizing your poor shopping practices as we all pay higher prices from that type of behavior.

Do your research on stuff before you decide to purchase it. Read or watch reviews. Then decide whether or not you want this product - BEFORE YOU BUY IT. Return it if it doesn't work right or something is wrong (eg, if you ordered a red item but a blue one arrived), but if you just decide you don't like it, then you made a poorly researched purchase and that's on you.

I said in my response that returning clothing that doesn't fit is an acceptable return.

Honestly sometimes reading reviews I totally get why they'd make it more difficult. If I buy something and it arrives damaged or not working, then obviously that's a return. Clothing if it doesn't fit, sure.

That said, I've read some forum posts or reviews for something in binoculars where the person is sayings things like "I bought 3 pairs and tried them out and then sent back the 2 I didn't like.". Or "I didn't like this one feature about an item - sending it back."

The return policy shouldn't be a way to test drive products that you may or may not keep. It should be reserved for when something is obviously faulty, misrepresented, etc. If I don't do my research and end up buying something I don't like but its functioning exactly the way its intended to, then that's on me.

The anti-truck crowd usually is pretty unaware of how often people use their trucks for truck things. Most people driving those trucks have a legitimate reason. If they have a boat they probably need a tow-vehicle on the weekend. Or they hunt and tossing a bloody deer into the trunk of a car isn't exactly a great idea. Or they need to haul trash to the dump.

Realistically even if you only need a truck 20-30 times a year, you're still going to usually drive that rather than buy 2 vehicles. Different people lead different lives and buy vehicles to suit their needs. If you don't need something (or even want something) that doesn't mean that everybody who does need that item is being foolish or making bad choices.

If you have a truck you can't really use the bed for large amounts of loose items as they'll blow around or out. The bed is mostly for larger items. As such they need to go into the back seat.

And the "projectiles" bit is just spreading fear anyways. Not only are crashes not the norm, but a box of spaghetti smacking you against the head is the least of your worries in a car accident.

The most common way these things detect a passenger in a seat is weight - which is also caused by items or cargo in the car. I don't want to face endless chimes or buckle in a few 12 packs of sodas.

Its bad enough that my truck already thinks anything I put in the back seat is a child so I get the "check the rear seat for children" alarm. Which can be disabled, but ironically, the pop up on my screen that says not to focus on the screen while driving as it can cause accidents can not. And what usually pulls my attention to the screen? The damned pop-up that says not to be looking at it.

Honda has a near unmatched reputation for reliability. Any other brand (excepting Toyota) would bring its standards down.

Caste equates to class. Wealth is one way to determine societal standing but not the only way. Even in the west we had the concept of considering someone from the nobility to be of higher class than a merchant who technically had more money.

We basically had a caste system it just was only 2 levels (noble and commoner) and the commoners were never subjected to quite as much derision as the lowest class of Indian society.

Its literally being shut down in a month for NOT complying with US law.

The one guy's dissent basically boils down to "I don't necessarily disagree with the ruling, but Biden shouldn't be passing stuff right before he leaves office.". Sounds almost like he supports it but probably wants to wait so that Trump can get the credit for it.

AMD made the same move years ago (they spun off their foundry in 2009 and sold it off in 2012) and has been doing significantly better since then.

I'm not saying it will work out the same for Intel, but its not an automatic assured death sentence.

I'd really hate to see Intel go under as competition is good for the consumer and we need multiple players in the industry.

Plenty of people pay for Youtube to avoid ads and not have to jump through hoops like downloading crap ahead of watching it.

That said, this isn't for Youtube (which is Youtube Premium) - its for Youtube TV. That has Youtube in the name but that's pretty much just branding purposes. Its a streaming Cable/Satellite TV competitor that offers streaming live cable channels.

The Constitution says that the Supreme Court is the only entity that can determine constitutionality. You're going outside of the constitution merely by trying to claim something is unconstitutional without SCOTUS review.

Only the Supreme Court can determine if a law is unconstitutional. Until and unless they weigh in on the subject an individual citizen (and certainly not a corporation) does not have the ability to make such a determination.

A tech savy person could easily get around a block via a proxy or VPN, but 90% of the population isn't going to know how (or even if they couldn't wouldn't consider it worth the bother).

Putting a block even that isn't 100% effective would more or less cripple the platform in the country.