Submission + - Innocent man jailed 18 months on basis of mistyped userid. (ctvnews.ca)
Submission + - FBI gets voter's IP address in new fraud probe tactic (axios.com)
The FBI recently obtained the IP address of someone who registered online in South Carolina, according to documents first shared with Axios.
Comment horrible idea (Score 2) 176
Comment Re: Not this shit again (Score 2) 109
Comment Re:Respecting copyright is an important part of FO (Score 4, Interesting) 109
Comment Re:cost? (Score 1) 108
Comment cost? (Score 2, Insightful) 108
Comment Re:Self-loathing Canucks (Score 1, Insightful) 57
Comment Re:I don't think it would matter (Score 1) 57
Comment Re:China is terrible (Score 2) 55
Comment Re:a step too far (Score 1) 347
you sir, are blind, war is never good
What an utterly naive interpretation of world history you have. I can assure you, if you'd been a Jew being rounded up for extermination in WW2 you'd have a different opinion. Likewise, if you were Chinese or Korean being subjugated by Imperial Japan, you'd have a different perspective. There is such a thing as a "just war" even though you somehow ignore the concept. It's usually when your opponent starts the war and is hell bent on eradicating you and your way of life.
Alas, you sit there in perfect safety and comfort, passing judgement on those who sacrificed fa more than you can ever imagine so you could impugn their sacrifices.
Comment Re:Oh look. (Score 1) 347
For now, people can worry about what type of weapons to use and whether or not certain types should be banned.
But in the future, all the debates will be about will be "how do we pick just the right grid squares in which to Kill All Humans?"
Banned for who? And who's going to enforce this ban?
You have to remember any treaty (a) must have signatories that agree to follow it and (b) there must be a method of enforcement. If you lack either of these two conditions, the treaty has no effect.
Comment Re: Oh look. (Score 1) 347
If there was a "total war" America would not exist anymore.
Not sure how you think you could pull that off, but whatever.
We sink your carriers, then we siege your cities.
Again...exactly how do you plan to accomplish this? It's not like Iran hasn't been firing missiles at our carriers this whole time. Yeah, it's a halfhearted effort by the Iranians, but what exactly do you think would happen to Iran if you managed to even damage one of our carriers, much less sink one? I can describe it thusly: the American gloves would come off. Iran would be plastered into oblivion via conventional bombardment, and there's very little Iran could do to stop it. Sure, we'd take losses, but the Iranian regime would cease to exist in totality. America has had this option available to it since day one. We haven't exercised it. Not because we couldn't do it but because we chose not to. Do not mistake restraint for a lack of capability.