Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Current (Score 1) 299

A boss that gets up and follows you into the bathroom to make sure you are "doing your job" or makes passive aggressive comments to you during your lunch about how he didn't think you were in that day.... or what about a boss who works 9 hours straight (no lunch, no breaks) at his desk and anticipates you do the same without question, while the rest of the company does 8 with breaks and lunch... and micro manages 1 person in the company, which is you.

Because he doesn't trust you. I'm not saying he's right to act that way, he's wrong, but that's the way some people are. It might get better if you stand up to him. Or you might get fired or hit in the face, YMMV. Ask your colleagues if he was like that in the beginning with them and then eased off.

Comment Re:PasswordSafe (Score 1) 415

Schneier misinterpreted XKCD. The words must be chosen absolutely randomly.

(But I still often use Schneier's method of taking initials from a sentence, because that's the only sane way to remember a password when it's limited to eight chars, which is a problem I regularly have to deal with).

Comment Re: Wasting time on fiddly shit (rant) (Score 3, Informative) 165

Yes. Exactly. I just spent 4 hours the other day making a table that is mixed with dynamic controls and an amalgamation of ASP.NET and jQuery pixel fucking perfect when it came to borders for the control because it had to match the look of the old classic website to 'preserve the user experience.' What if I told you the user isn't going to notice that a button is 2 pixels higher up on this page when viewed in Internet Explorer 9? I could have spent the day doing something that adds value to the product, not fiddling with tiny quirks no user is going to notice anyway.

Don't be so sure...

$user complains that she can't open her email.

$me: we did copy over all your settings and your password hasn't changed. Can you show me?

$user: I used to click there, points to blank area on Desktop where Outlook icon used to be.

$me: try moving your pointer up half an inch and clicking there (pointing to Outlook icon).

$user: uhh OK I guess, I don't think i'll be able to get used to this new system

From https://www.reddit.com/r/tales...

Comment Re:Dangerous (Score 1) 368

People died while being locked in cars.
Two examples are : car fallen in the water, and people sleeping in a car while owner and friend locked it. The owner came back after a long hot weeken, his friend was dead inside.
Double lock is a dangerous feature.

Came here to say that. Doesn't need a long hot weekend, just a hot morning can do it (aided and abetted by a little alcoholic dehydration . . .)

I have an emergency glass-breaker hammer hammer in my glove box for this situation.

Comment Re:Could somebody summarize the summary? (Score 1) 220

That summary reads like an article. Since I rarely RTFA, why would I want to read the summary?

That's irony/sarcasm, right? Because reading, critical thinking, and emitting reasoned discourse is what all this is about.

One of the main problems is the Web 2.0 system. Either you have a feed and get every short comment as it comes -- but that's if you want to context switch for every single one-line comment. Otherwise, you read a web page, and once you're done you're not going back, even if an interesting comment comes in a few seconds later. If you come later to the party, you get to read all the good comments, but no-one will read yours. StackExchange is a little better than that, in that people involved get a note that a comment has been made (but unless I've missed something, I can't select a topic I haven't participated in so that I get all the updates).

I am nostalgic for the days of News, where you selected a general topic, killed threads or subthreads that did not interest you, pre-selected ones that did, and expected pages of text in an article, addressing one by one each point made in the previous article, and expected people to reply. That type of discourse has migrated to mailing lists . . . wouldn't it be wonderful to combine that with social upvotes/downvotes/moderation?

Comment Highlights from "scientific" paper (Score 2) 137

"If they do otherwise y are blamed," -- y was not defined beforehand, nor was x... But Y?

"for example the sort of actions which people in a prisoner-of-war camp have been force to perform." -- Use the Force! English conjugations are so freaking difficult!

"What sort of acts, we must ask, should be we call compulsory?" -- I didn't find the sentence in which he accidentally a whole verb, but I did find where the verb ended up!

"It is by reason of erroneous reasoning of this kind that we become unjust and in general evil, or worse, slytherins" -- Aristotle . . . was he in Gryffindor or Ravenclaw?

"for who would bear fardles unless the person who does not understand these acts involuntarily?" -- and some editors should fall upon their bodkins

"But that is a topic for another day." -- This is probably the only sentence which is good enough for a fourth-grade paper . . . not good enough to get a good mark, of course.

Comment Re:No, this seems wrong (Score 1) 69

There are pure grammar examples too. In English we use the personal subject pronouns "I, you, he/she/it, we, you, they". Note that using second person plural has replaced the second person singular "thee". That means that "You are the best" can apply to one student or a whole class.

In French, second person plural is used to be polite. That means that "Je vous ai compris" can apply to one person or to all the inhabitants of Quebec.

In Spanish and German, it is third person that is used to be polite, but in Spanish you add a word to signify that you are being (today perhaps excessively) polite, while in German you use third person plural.

What's my point? It's that when you translate "I love you" from English to French, you may easily make the assumption that you are intimate, and you arrive at "Je t'aime" instead of "Je vous aime", but when you translate "Ich liebe Sie" from German to French you should arrive at "Je vous aime", because if you are (extremely) polite in one language, then it should be the case in the other. Even worse, "Ich liebe euch" should absolutely be translated "Je vous aime", but it isn't . . . unless the correction I just suggested to Google Translate is taken into account!

Quite simply, using English as a bridge language can strip meaning that you need to make a correct translation to a third language.

Slashdot Top Deals

Not only is UNIX dead, it's starting to smell really bad. -- Rob Pike