Having people who've committed past crimes and being crime free are two different things. To answer your question; the truth is in most Asian they are openly racist and no one really bats an eye at it. Racism isn't criminal though, it's just asshole.

Why ask? To what end? They surrendered 80 years ago.

Again, a digital song is something is covered under WIPO. Journalism has special laws even if the source is copyrighted. Besides, it's China. When have they ever respected other people's copyright laws?

WIPO is just an extension of Berne and does not apply to journalism. It's for books, art, etc. Are you gonna argue a hot mic moment is a literary work? Bunch of pro censorship boot lickers.

What international law? You're just stating that as if it's true. Besides, it's journalism and in countries that recognize free speech the request would be laughed at.

No normal person, R or D, says Sandy Hook didn't happen. Do you really think it's fair to classify the most extreme in a group as a voice for the whole?

Must've been some other reason I said "In the US" then.

"Thereby solving the problem forever"

It depends on where and how big the business is. In the US, most workplace harassment laws don't apply to businesses under 15 employees.

No, they voted anti immigration and anti woke. They voted for anyone but Kamala, whose charisma rivals that of John Kerry.

I lived in ND (and SD and MN) for many many years. None of it even comes close to rain forest. Ndsurvivor needs to remember there were almost no trees on the Great Plains 150 years ago. Even old maps call it the great desert.

Democrats were bragging about their leader's intelligence and wit for three and a half years while he obviously suffered from dementia. So it's not like they have... they have... I mean come on man!

Why would you bring a full payload to orbit to test heat shielding and stresses on the outer skin? That is all a factor of speed and acceleration, not mass.

Basically, yeah. I think guys are freaking out over the apps existence too much. Have you ever tried to convince someone that who they are dating is shit? Even when it's obvious it still won't phase someone "in love". At best you'll just piss them off. If a woman is on there looking up a guy she isn't vetting them, she's digging up garbage. People go looking online to confirm their beliefs, not challenge them. Just look at any political thread.

That was the intent anyway. It turned out after the leak that it was mostly just women shitting on guys they've never dated.