Everyone calls the autopilot George.
And by the way, autonomous flying is not that hard. The hard part is having the biological backup in case things go wrong.
All the stuff that used o be exactingly specified can now be vaguely described and you get a half-decent result. It's certainly interesting times.
We really shouldn't be so surprised, Star Trek has been promising this style of computer interaction for decades. I think maybe we just didn't really believe it.
People get defensive about the idea that a machine can take their job. It's human nature. We think we are Picard in "The Measure of a Man," but when it comes down to it, most of us are Maddox.
That was happening 25 years ago too you know. Firefly had the advantage of having Enterprise around to draw fire in that regard, but it was still there.
> what the hell Human resources??? Are you really that freakin incompetent?
Yeah.....that's why the whole "just use merit" thing doesn't work. We aren't very good at assessing it.
My point has nothing to do with the use of AI militarily. No software of any kind, from any government contractor, can include any line of code that Anthropic's software might have been involved in creating. That's what a supply chain IS.
It's not just Microsoft. It's everyone. All the defense contractors would have to avoid using Claud or any software Claud might have been involved in creating. That's just not practical. Expect more of this.