The negatives cited in the summary all sound either very hypothetical or niche cases. For the majority, if you are able to complete the work you're assigned, what does it matter where you are? Sounds like just another case of those wanting to micromanage their direct reports and justify their own job.

Definitely bad reporting. They remark about it being a "a turbulent week for Boeing, with the US plane maker suffering a series of safety-related issues," but then go on to list:

• 1. The engine ingesting plastic wrap on the airfield (not even remotely Boeing's fault)
• 2. Fumes in the cabin (haven't heard this one, so can't comment)
• 3. A tire falling off (maintenance issue)
• 4. Rolling off the runway (pilot error from taking the corner too fast in a rush to line up for takeoff)

Absolutely not. This whole tipping culture is already out of hand. Use that shiny new union and demand fair wages; don't rely on tips for that income.

The AC is right. 19:10 is the same ratio as 17.1:9, just using whole numbers instead of decimals. That was my whole point: either use proper whole number ratios, or if you're going to use decimals, then just make it a ratio against 1. 19:10 makes a hell of a lot more sense than 171:90.

A tangent to the actual issue, but the only reason "16:9" is the name of the other ratio is because that's the set of whole numbers needed to achieve the ratio. If you're going to start throwing decimals into the mix, might as well just simplify it to "1.9:1" instead.

Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that most people would choose to race. Without even seeing the graph, let alone one supplemented with additional relevant data, just based on the text description here of the general shape, it already sounded obvious that lower temperatures meant higher rates of failure.

Jesus, calm down. I just browse the internet and am mildly annoyed when people share these deep yellow screenshot. Don't know where the hell you got this photo editing screenshot crap from.

It does, however, make all of your screenshots look like crap.

THANK YOU! I was scrolling down through the comments, and you're the first person who actually gets it. It's not that she said bad things about Jews, but how she exploited their very real history of persecution to feed her own baseless persecution complex. She has every right to say those things, but freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from accountability, and I wouldn't for a second blame Disney for not wanting to be associated with such messaging.

Reading these comments, clearly I'm in the minority, but I actually prefer Backspace=Back. I virtually never have an issue with this, as it seems any decent website knows not to go back if you're typing in a textbox. Hopefully someone releases a small add-on to reinstate this feature as they did when Chrome pulled this same move a while back.

You missed Step 1: it's a paid app. Subscriptions would probably be more profitable, but might be easier to get away with just an upfront cost.

The title makes it sound like a widespread problem, but it looks like this has only happened to a single person. Honestly, seems like some idiot user accidentally turned on a notification feature and then was upset when it did what he told it to do. Just because he wasn't aware of what he did or how he could easily stop it doesn't really make it a scandal.

You do realize that the recent data dump was not of the emails on Clinton's server, right? They were on Podesta's person Gmail account, so even if we had every last email that ever existed on that server—no matter how trivial—you wouldn't be able to confirm the authenticity of this leak (of course with the exception of anything he sent to that server, but that hasn't been what's featured so far).

The rest of the conspiracy theory stuff just isn't worth getting into a pointless internet argument over. Nothing I say will sway you from thinking she's "Crooked Hillary," and nothing you say will convince me she actually did anything with malice. I do object to your logic that "all we can do is assume they are real," but to each his own.

Except when you have no way to verify what leaked emails are real, which ones are manipulated, and which ones are completely fabricated, and you're simply trusting that a foreign power that's actively trying to manipulate the political process in this country is releasing *only* the truth and not performing any alterations to advance their own agenda.

That's the thing about news articles, though. You use headlines and summaries to tease juicy stories and entice readers to check out the rest. If this is the juiciest bit, then I stand by my statement that there's nothing of substance.