Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We put 8 protesters in jail for life (Score 1) 125

So I understand that you can only read at about a fourth grade level because well, you're a bot trained on Americans talking on the internet and all.

But Jesus Christ could we please improve the quality of the bots around here? They are starting to get embarrassing. I frankly expect better technical skills from the sort of person who runs a bot on a dying web forum.

Comment We put 8 protesters in jail for life (Score 2) 125

And nobody batted an eye.

Even if you make the argument that one of the eight fired a gun that might have hit a cop you've still got to contend with the other seven who were just at a protest and are now rotting in prison until the day they die unless a Democrat president happens to pardon them, either that or they can come up with a couple million dollars each to buy a pardon from Trump.

I guess what I'm getting at here is you already gave up your civil rights. Or if you didn't then your neighbor did for you.

It is possible you will get them back in two or three years. But is it stands right now you have absolutely no civil rights in this country. At any moment the current administration and the courts they packed with corrupt judges could decide you're a terrorist and you're off to Federal pound me in the ass prison for the rest of your life contingent on the Democrats winning an election and having the political Capital available to pardon you.

So it's not even news that some guy who tried to exercise a basic civil right is going to jail now. If he gets off it will be because he lucked into the unique combination of a judge that wasn't corrupt and a jury who can read above a fourth grade level. And those aren't odds I would want to take.

Comment We have known homework is useless for years (Score 2, Interesting) 23

A very tiny amount of homework can be beneficial. We don't give a very tiny amount of homework. When my kid was in high school which admittedly was going on a decade ago now I think, I mean they just hit grad school for fuck sake also Christ I'm old, my kid had sometimes 6 to 8 hours of homework on a fucking school night.

From what I heard the local chamber of commerce AKA a bunch of asshole rich businessmen who never worked a day in their fucking lives, lobbied the school board to drastically increase the amount of homework. Enough parents complained that they dropped it to around 4 to 6 hours per night. It wasn't uncommon for me to get up to go pee at night and find my kids still studying.

Anyway to get back on track we know homework isn't effective or useful at educating kids. We all have Google you can find the studies I mean I hope you can. Maybe try chat GTP.

But what homework is really good for is when you have a shitload of kids and you have more kids who are perfectly capable of doing useful work for society then you have opportunities you want to bother giving those kids because we don't have kids do useful work for society we have kids do useful work for ultra wealthy psychopathic asshole billionaires.

Basically it's a way to sort people into how useful they're going to be for billionaires. You dump a bunch of work on them and you see which ones break. The ones that don't break get to move on with their lives and maybe have shelter and healthcare and that they're really lucky when they're too old to work anymore we let them die in peace.

It's like the sorting hat from Harry Potter but somehow still even more fucked up and dystopian when you think about it

Comment Re:Shocked! (Score 3, Interesting) 23

That is not what they found. What they found is that if you spend 60 minutes doing the homework with AI, you learn approximately as much as someone who spends 60 minutes doing it without AI. If you spend 20 minutes doing it with AI, you learn as much as someone who spends 20 minutes doing it without AI. Etc. The only real difference is that the AI people get way better homework scores, and as a result, tend to stop spending as much time, and thus tend to learn less.

That's what this preprint study found.

Comment Re:Get rid of homework (Score 1) 23

100% this. Even a short 5-minute quiz with just a couple questions at the start of each day will do the trick. But you simply can't rely on homework scores to be a proxy of learning or time spent studying anymore. Brief daily quizzes on the previous day's material will force them to.

Also, It's not like students have the excuse of, "I couldn't study, I didn't have anyone to explain X to me" anymore. The very AI that they might otherwise use to cheat on their homework can also explain to them the things they missed in last year's algebra class that are blocking them from learning this year's calculus, or whatnot. Congrats - you now have an infinitely patient personal tutor who will spend hours dumbing things down for you until you get it. Now you have no excuse - learn the material. It becomes all about actually putting the time in.

Comment Re:Shocked! (Score 2) 23

Yeah. There's been widespread misrepresentation of this (preprint!) in the media. What they actually found: test scores correspond to how much time you spend doing homework, regardless of whether you use AI or not. Which should not be a surprising result! Of course, the AI people, esp. those who had been using AI for more than a few months, stopped spending much time on their homework, and then their test scores fell to match the non-AI users who didn't spend much time in their homework either.

The TL/DR is, in today's age, you cannot use test scores as a proxy of how much time a user is studying or knows the material.

There are of course some caveats, beyond the fact that it's just a preprint - notably that there's nothing to separate why the user started using AI to do their homework, so there's potential confounders in there. For example, if a student is in a poor family, maybe they had to get a job to help pay the bills. But working a job itself can lower test scores - for example, having to work late the night before an exam. So there are some confounder problems with the study. That said, I'm sure the general conclusion is correct: time spent doing the thing = amount of learning the thing (relatively independent of what tools you're using in the process).

Comment It's funny to watch how people (Score 5, Insightful) 45

Who just spent the last 50 years blowing off democracy for nonsense moral panics and their particular interpretation of some dumb book somehow think that when the screws start to tighten on them that all of that machinery of democracy that they have cheerfully allowed to be dismantled is going to save them.

People like me have been warning people like that for years that eventually the psychopath doing this will get around to them. How George Carlin warned them.

And here we are and all I've got to say is I told you so.

Comment Oh fuck no (Score -1, Flamebait) 55

Unless they're going to completely overhaul their POS it's going to be a clusterfuck every time somebody tries to pay with that crap. It already doesn't work at places with much much newer stuff and much better stuff but along the ancient crap Walmart uses. Some of them don't even have tap and pay for Christ's sake.

And somehow I doubt the cheapskates running Walmart are going to pay to overhaul their entire system. So they're going to use a bunch of really old hardware that is really flaky. And I get to sit in line waiting for somebody to give up and pull their real fucking credit card out of their wallet

Comment They aren't massive (Score 2) 219

It's a tiny system on a chip. The screens are annoying as fuck though. When I'm driving around at 60 plus miles per hour I do not want to have to fumble on the screen to adjust temperature control or change the radio station.

As for the rest of the computers and software that's why you're able to drive a car.

People insist on having cars that can accelerate like mad but get good gas mileage overall. Even if you don't personally care about gas mileage we have to force you to have a fuel efficient car or everybody would drive gas guzzlers because they're so gosh darn cool and the price of gas would become prohibitive. Folks do not realize how big an effect all these fuel economy saving features have had. Also and you think this would be important for nerds who are prone to asthma but we need software to manage emissions reductions.

Comment Re: Good (Score 3, Insightful) 92

The problem is if you're over 60 it's been working just fine because they have made it a point to leave you out of all the really nasty stuff they do to everybody else so that you will continue to vote to screw over everybody else.

Now that is scheduled to change in 2032 when social security benefits get cut by $500 a month minimum. With the basic idea that if the Democrats manage to save democracy then they have a mess the Republicans can use to get more concessions by threatening to kill people as per the usual and if the Democrats don't win in 2028 then that's it for democracy and the billionaires can do basically anything they want to any of us and they will.

Meanwhile I know for a fact that is a bunch of dipshit old people on this forum who think they are going to be just fine because they bought a little bit of rental property before prices went crazy and don't have a fucking clue what's coming.

Honestly it must be nice. It's that whole sweet summer child thing where you have no fucking idea. Or like the libertarian house cat thing. Fiercely convinced of their independence while being utterly dependent on a system they neither understand nor appreciate.

Whatever the case when the healthcare system collapses and the price of the drugs they need to not die of a heart attack goes from several hundred dollars a month to $10,000 a month they're going to find out how worthless that little sliver of rental property they have is.

Or maybe the Democrats will save them yet again. But it's getting harder and harder for the Democrats to save these motherfuckers from themselves. Frankly they can all fuck off and die as far as I'm concerned but they keep dragging me down with them

Comment I think I'd be upset about Chinese propaganda (Score 0, Troll) 48

If the Saudis weren't buying basically everything that the rest of the billionaires didn't already own and if I hadn't just watched the 90% billionaire owned news media spend an entire election cycle sane washing Donald Trump while giving multiple weeks of coverage every time Joe Biden so much as coughed.

I mean I know that psychopaths are constantly beaming propaganda into my eye sockets to make me do stupid shit having one more group of psychopathic assholes doing that is hardly news.

Comment sudo make me a data center (Score 1) 92

Step 1: Propose a new data center.
Step 2: Leak false information claiming the current city council is planning to approve it.
Step 3: Agitprop a recall election.
Step 4: Front two slates of staunchly anti-data-center sockpuppets, one liberal and one conservative.
Step 5: Have the winner approve your data center.

And that's why "betrayal of public office" needs to be a capital offense.

Comment We do not accept your lack of acceptance (Score 1) 19

The company disputed any characterization that the data was "exposed," saying that an "ordinary member of the public" would not have come across it.

Well then, it's a good thing only "ordinary members of the public" would ever dream of trying to crack your service to provide unintended access! Those pesky Russian hackers would never dream of using means "not discoverable through ordinary use", right?

Slashdot Top Deals

The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Working...