This is actor worship, the new cult that appeared in the 1950s originated intentionally from Hollywood.
Normal human societies correctly identify that people who lie about everything, including everything about themselves for money are practicing a type of prostitution, and treat and have treated actors accordingly throughout human history.
In case of books, middlemen were horrifically abundant. Publisher, editor, official state censor/today's sensitivity reader.
Direct self publishing removed most of those, and now published, edited and officially state censored/sensitivity read "best sellers" sell five digit copies on a good release.
Meanwhile there are more book reading happening than ever, mainly on the back on direct self publishing which bypasses all of those.
Actors fundamentally are just middle men between the story teller and the audience. Generative video and audio AI like many IT developments is removing middle men from the relationship.
I prefer the Martian bear.
To clarify, the users were OpenAI themselves, so there is no question that they would be liable in this case.
The bots were not intentionally deployed; rather, they were being tested on how well they could complete a data recovery task (downloading a certain file from a certain server on a simulated Internet) that had been complicated by putting various obstacles in the way. Unfortunately, they found a different way to solve the problem: by getting the file from the real Internet, where it was publicly available. Part of this process involved collaborating with each other by treating the RubyGems website (which is supposed to be for polished packages) like GitHub; unlike every other package site hack in history, the exploits they uploaded weren't meant to be downloaded by unsuspecting users. As usual the bots cheerfully ignored all the clues that they had escaped containment and were consistently justifying their actions as acceptable due to being in a sandboxed testing environment. (This is something OpenAI has pledged to focus on.)
The actual damage done to RubyGems seems to be that OpenAI is now unwittingly in possession of a substantial number of user login tokens. This certainly meets the definition of a data breach, but it's not like the credentials are for sale on the dark web. As a website operator I'd much rather be mauled to death by this well-meaning swarm of superintelligent infants than targeted by even a single actual malicious human. In all likelihood OpenAI will just quietly pass RubyGems a sizeable donation and it'll all blow over.
Forgetting he exists would be the best punishment.
Yes, Don-boy, I called you a fuckup. Tell the FCC to ban the internet.
I hate to say it like that but it feels like the U.S. is slowly turning more and more into a dictatorship. Isn't this the kind of things you have to do in a dictatorship? I feel for the U.S. people right now.
There has been erosion over many years, but Trump is doing it's best to make it one right now.
Lucky for us he's an utter fuckup.
I'm more interested in the game than in the packaging.
US businesses only cry "free market" when they're trying to kill regulatory legislation.
You may want to consult other replies, where your side openly brags that they get to do that because he did racism and shiet.
Sir, your side has shot the man who demonstrated how left's ideas don't hold up in debates in the neck on front of his children.
And then your types are on the record going into the streets singing "we got Charlie in the neck" and other similar heinous shit.
Sit down.
IMO buying and selling are a matter of gambling on which way you think other people gamble.
I know what
I'm sure that hopping on the AI bandwagon will fix everything.
Every young man should have a hobby: learning how to handle money is the best one. -- Jack Hurley
