Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Reminds me of a conversation with a colleague (Score 0) 228

Yes, the answer to violence is usually more violence.

Yes, actually, that's correct. Were you trying to be ironic or funny? When somebody is intent on harming you, and actively trying to harm you, it's very unlikely that saying "Come on, hey, come on, stop that, won't you?" is going to do much to stop them from punching you in the face.

On the other hand, being clearly capable & unafraid of beating the shit out of them is often an effective deterrent, and if deterrence fails, employing your capability for violence WILL end the violence being directed at you.

There are all kinds of reasons why somebody would view violence as a legitimate path, and BEFORE somebody engages in violence, you may be able to redirect that intention using talk and persuasion... but once violence is employed, it's not likely you're going to be able to talk someone out of continuing the violence without being willing and able to defend yourself, violently.

What if this somebody is harming you because you keep stealing his lunch? Your idea is to keep beating the shit out of him until he can't attack you anymore?

America, fuck yeah!

Comment Re:Debian bugs (Score 0) 55

There's a "really funny" story about xscreensaver, that you should look up one day...

Thank you for the very entertaining read. Now I know not use Debian anymore.

My favorite quote from that discussion:

I'm personally totally fine with having an 18 months old xscreensaver in Stable. As I am with nearly all other packages. I mean, it's Stable, not bleeding edge.

Guys, 1999 called, they want their Software Development practices back.

Comment Shitty one-time apps, meet webapp! (Score 0) 141

I hope these kind of studies reach the ears of Apple and Google so that they may push for 100% HTML5+JavaScript based webapps.

Currently, specs exist to use just about any feature imaginable from native apps with JavaScript, but a lot of them remain unimplemented.

I understand their business decision. After all, it's much easier to take a piece of the cake when you control 100% of the distribution. But it's not fair to the user or the app developers to force everyone into making sloppy native apps.

Comment Let's Encrypt is only for encryption (Score 2, Informative) 123

I don't see why this is news at all. Let's Encrypt is a great way to allow any webmaster to offer a TLS-protected connection between his users and his server.

As a user, seeing a website using a Let's Encrypt or StartSSL certificate does not tell me anything about the legitimacy of that website. All it does is guarantee that my connection won't be intercepted through a MITM attack. Personally, I never "just trust" the little lock icon in my address bar: I click it and see who signed it. Then I make a decision on whether or not I trust that website with my information.

Slashdot Top Deals

We can found no scientific discipline, nor a healthy profession on the technical mistakes of the Department of Defense and IBM. -- Edsger Dijkstra