making absurd generalizations about your opponents while ignoring the fact that your tech isn't actually the only fossil fuel alternative out there
It was while the world was building most of those 20,000 coal plants. We have not forgotten.
Citation please, I believe you are very much mistaken. Yes, AI absolutely CANNOT be trusted, but that doesn't mean legal obligations don't exist.
Since you're the one positing a legal obligation I'd rather think the citation ball is in your court.
Consider a human analogy: In many cases, people give financial advisors access to one or more of their accounts so that the advisor can make trades or other transactions for the benefit of their clients. However, if an advisor suddenly starts making transactions that do not benefit the clients or are contrary to their agreed instructions, then that activity is unauthorized, even if they have login credentials.
That would be a fiduciary. AI is certainly not that. Not today anyway.
maintaining two separate browsers was difficult to justify
Especially two browsers nobody has ever heard of.
One thing that should be abundantly clear is that the Trump admin doesn't control everything in the executive branch.
Well no, no that is not clear at all. What the rest of the world sees is peak sycophancy.
There's no evidence the administration is afraid of smart people.
Where are they hiding them?
DACs are not purely in the digital domain, "perfect" does not apply to DACs.
Indeed the exact same digital stream played through different DAC chips with their supporting algorithms and filters can sound quite significantly different. My own DAP has an AKM chip, but some people prefer ESS, Wolfson, TI/Burr-Brown, etc. I did not actually RTFA, but historically Sony has used their own DAC chips, some of which have been quite good, so I assume that remains the case here. That is probably more meaningful to people who care about sound than the gold plated screws.
Then have the smart people devise an AI policy for the all the other people to follow.
That is how it would normally work, yes. I simply pointed out why it does not work that way now.
I think we all know a person who is an expert in their field but dumb as rocks with things outside of it.
Indeed smart people always consider the tradeoffs involved in being spied on by the Chinese or the Americans. Government has nothing to add to that conversation in any case.
Why would this have been getting use with Federal Agencies already?
Pretty good question. Thing to do now is: see who complains and start watching them.
Because smart people use the best tool for the job. And this administration is very afraid of smart people.
Hi, I'm a real French woman
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
The robots are operated by a mega corp thereby making them more important than you.
And they can't be calling the police every time they are blocked so obviously the robots need some way of clearing their own path...
Base 8 is just like base 10, if you are missing two fingers. -- Tom Lehrer
