Oh boy, seriously? Altman, who zuckerberged openai and promised AGI in 2025 (AGI is also the key deliverable to get away from Microsoft control) who had a concrete "vision" of AGI coming in 2025, is suddenly "concerned" in 2026? Because ?

AGI was promised back in 2025.
The openai boss, that zuckerberged commercial openai from a non-profit openai, was absolutely certain that AGI will be there in 2025, he had a very concrete plan with clear deliverables, dear investors!
Oh, wait, and the Microsoft grip (major investor into openai zuckerberged by Altman from non-profit openai) on the company is supposed to be released... exactly when it achieves AGI.
So now we are in 2026, and you want me to believe that out of these 2:

1. The filthy fucks who still depend on dozens of billions poured into their stolen creations need a story explaining why they have fialed to deliver
2. The filthy fucks (who promised amazing things such as "no more white collar jobs to junior workers") are suddenly concerned about security, because ?

It is the latter? Oh, ok.

The story here is that the folks that have promised a lot (AGI in 2025 anyone? Major breakthroughs in technology across the board anyone? Amazing new drugs (no, that cancer vaccine in the phase 3 trials has nothing to do with the LLMs) anyone?) are now creating waves of FUD to explain to investors why did they fail to deliver. Amodei, back in 2019, while at NON-PROFIT openai (that was not zuckerberged by him and those other lovely high moral folks), was telling the world that releasing GPT 2s weights to the public was an existencial threat.

When there is only a handful of serious players, why would someone value "API marketplace" startup so much?

I am shocked that people don't see an obvious dull PR stunt.

Since when does a hardware manufacturer own the servers? Or which particular Nvidia model is Apple interested in running on? Or why would google need anything, but own TPU chips that nowadays can do training, let alone, inference? I thought "get paid for mentioning nvidia" was a conspiracy theory, but here we go again...

After OpenAI went AWOL.

Thank god, there is China. A country known for opennes.

Nor Opera.

I recall they were dominating like that since 2000s.

I think we need more lesbian writers and lesbian characters. I also want to see not just blue and pink hair, but more colors, e.g. I don't recall a single movie with green haired progressive-like outlook. On the other hand, space female homosexuals conceiving babies with lesbian spells was amazing. Please do more of that. And whatever happened with Witcher series - is simply stunning. All that was achieved with mere 18-30% of the writers being lesbian. Imagine the heights that we can reach with 50%.

DGAF about benchmarks, I recall germini beat GPT and that Chineze bazinga also performed "very well" on paper. My personal hall of fame: Sonnet - a good work horse, might act a bit silly at times, but works very well if you are setting the context boundaries well. GPT (generic) - a more capable at cracking the harder tasks. (e.g. "let's grab Oracle driver in go and patch it to get to streaming blobs). I find Sonnet's code to be more readable. Opus - I don't get the hype. 3x cost... for what? When Sonnet got stuck, GPT and (a more rare event, but it happened) Gemini could do it better.

1GW of heat, what does one do with it in space, that is 'very very cold' but also very very empty.

He posts about Epstein files at least once a day.

Oppressive regime that grew to a monster size on Western investments is now strongarming former bosses.

What a fucking shocking surprise.

It was surely not even remotely imaginable that we'll get into this sort of issues with Chinese commiess. /I am shocked, shocked...