Comment Re:Are you sure that's wise? (Score 3) 162
This is literally the same many russians say about their country. Doesn't mean it isn't a corrupt authoritarian shithole.
This is literally the same many russians say about their country. Doesn't mean it isn't a corrupt authoritarian shithole.
The right surely loves projecting.
Ever heard of a concept called "the warranty"?
A camera only system can only be capable of superhuman performance if object recognition is at least as good as humans are capable of. Currently, computer vision systems are nowhere near as good as humans at that and probably won't be for a very long time. Besides, for all "better optical sensors than the human eye" inferring is still performed with low resolution images, much lower resolution than a human eye is capable of, because it is computationally very expensive. This is why all those recaptcha images that are used to train computer vision systems are so small.
Hence his claim is spot on.
Is the person who ignored Pelosi in the room with you right now?
A NEET exam?
I thought people do that as a hobby or out of necessity.
Well, guess how Qantas is calling this A350 designed specifically for them?
Project Sunrise.
This "AI" seems to be severely lacking in training, in that no superior/invincible force (e.g. a party simulating law enforcement) showed up and demonstrated the downside to taking certain actions.
Dammit, can't anyone make some stylish cyber-shoes? That looks like shit! Anyone who goes around upskirt-snapping with shoes like that, is going to get laughed out of the ballroom by all the snobs.
Is it ok if I show up in regular glasses, but where an always-on LED is attached to the one of the corners? (I understand pervs are falling out of popularity, but that doesn't mean we need to abandon the whole aesthetic!)
Do we really have to reinvent the wheel every damn time?! It used to be that you just got Voight-Kampff tested, and the administrator of the test would sign your PGP key. WTF was wrong with that?!
My first reaction is that if one company is selling at half the price, that company will go bankrupt at twice the speed since every transaction was already a money-loser. Customers are absolutely the worst thing for these "businesses."
But is revenue really significant? I can see how neither reducing the price to $0 or increasing their price to 10x what it was, might not really have much of a different impact on the bottom line, compared to all the debt.
Like the NSA listening outposts in Europe that have been used for industrial espionage for years? This really is the pot calling the kettle a nigga.
Several freighters crashed in the meantime. They are as full-sized airliners as it gets. Just don't have any passengers.
Make IBM Great Again: go back to
"Conversion, fastidious Goddess, loves blood better than brick, and feasts most subtly on the human will." -- Virginia Woolf, "Mrs. Dalloway"