Comment Re:Boost? Ugh (Score 1) 398
Some parts are very useful. Smart pointers, bind, filesystem (we would have used the Windows API in my current project if I hadn't found it) and also string, which contains lots of things missing from C++'s standard string functions (like a split function). I find the mentioned parts of Boost to be quite easy to use too.
During the project I'm currently working on we would also use a graph. I checked out Boost's graph library and we chose not use it but implement our own graph. I now partly regret this, however I'm not sure Boost's graph would have been easy enough to use.