Comment Re:How about passing a law instead of EO? (Score 2, Insightful) 51
It's been going on since at least the W administration. Each new administration just gets worse. Congress won't take the initiative on anything.
It's been going on since at least the W administration. Each new administration just gets worse. Congress won't take the initiative on anything.
At least they can find his girlfriend.
Good luck providing proper medical equipment and facilities to DR Congo (much less encouraging proper sanitary practices).
Launch every Zig!
No, Chinese products are on the market because American manufacturers moved their production overseas ages ago, and China took advantage of the situation. American consumers generally don't care where their stuff is made so long as it meets their needs. The real winner has never been the American consumer but rather the importer.
Given the FCCs stance towards home routers, it won't be long before those devices go on the chopping block.
It would take more than a change to the Presidential administration to roll back such a bill.
If that were the case, the NSA could provide their own firmware. They could easily fork OpenWRT and force people to use it.
How is it crazy? The monetary value of the materials stolen doesn't change based on your awareness of what you stole. Ignorance is not a defense.
If a vehicle has an effective range of 200 miles or less and it's putting up 250+ miles per day, it ain't just charging overnight.
Are you saying the FCC can't withdraw certification of a device at a later date?
The FCC has been interfering with our ability to use communications gear for many many years. You'd think you'd be used to it by now.
The FCC should probably require open firmware. That would take out a lot of the hassle of securing network devices.
It's modded funny because OpenCL is all but dead for new projects. It got weighed down by industry infighting to the point that the big feature of OpenCL 3.0 in 2020 was undoing everything added to the spec after 2011.
So the idea of using OpenCL as a CUDA replacement, rather than something like ROCm or OneAPI, is funny. It's like rewriting C++ programs to use Pascal.
The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.