Tech layoffs are up sharply starting in 2022 specifically, so it follows that job postings would also be down in the same period.

Not sure what the point of this article is when the author wants to call out AI specifically and then claim AI might not be the cause.

Step 1: don't pay KPMG $670,000
Step 2: ???
Step 3: there is no step 2

Maybe soon it will be more common for a USB-C port to appear on every wall outlet throughout the world?

So if you're equating centrism to the Democratic party, what does that make left and right?

Don't we just end up giving billions of dollars to telcos to expand broadband into rural and low-income communities and bring service up to a higher standard, except it never actually happens and then the money is gone and no one asks for it back?

So public companies answer to hedge funds now?

> so I'm not really sure anything is wrong here.

When a customer orders the Phad Thai that is not from the Michelin-starred restaurant because they don't actually make Phad Thai, feels that it's quality is not up to their expectations for a Michelin-starred restaurant, and starts blasting their name around the web and suggesting that their Michelin star should be reconsidered, then you might understand how something could be wrong here.

"Your stuff is secure. It's highly protected!"

"Well, it's actually pretty wide open, but no one ever does."

"Well, sometimes people do, but only trusted members."

"Well, anyone can access it, but it's against policy."

"Well, lots of people do, but only for quality of service."

"Well, people sometimes do it for other reasons, but definitely only for business reasons."

"Ok, people watch you jack off all the fucking time and share it on the internet."

Been seeing ads on Youtube for that Facebook Portal device? Now imagine this wiretap scheme built into a device with an always-on camera you brought into your home and actually paid money for.

So then where does it get the other 37gbps from for the claimed total of 77+?

144 does it pretty well for me. I definitely notice the difference in the jump form 60 to 144, but not so much beyond that. The issue is that display resolution keeps going up too, so we keep needing more and more bandwidth to provide the same framerate at ever-increasing resolutions.

Does this mean then that Thunderbolt is getting a speed boost, too? The article claims that DP2.0 will leverage the "Thunderbolt 3 physical interface", but TB3 itself is limited to 40gig.

Morons do that, not cyclists. Morons expect to be able to dart out into traffic with impunity, not cyclists. Morons expect to be compensated for that sort of behavior, not cyclists.

Sounds like we're now setting a precedent to ALLOW it instead of the other way around.

That man has something to hide.