Um, who's whipping up hate of what now again? Who's complaining of "rage bait", lol?

I think most reasonable people understand that politicians are fallible and can be shortsighted and make mistakes. This is part of being human and part of life in government which, at it's core, is just a huge risk management agency. That's not to say that honest mistakes don't carry weight - Bush Jr may have truly believed everything he claimed about Iraq prior to invading it, but it was still a fool's errand, built on a scaffold of lies, and one of the biggest wastes of resources and lives in US history. Bush should be excoriated for that mistake, even if it was honest.

The problem is when intent and motive undermine the attempt at honest governance. If a politician has ulterior motives, such as personal enrichment, or to gain political advantage over an opposing person or party, to save face in the light of a mistake, or any number of other human foibles and failings, that's when it becomes a valid point to make.

For the helium reserve, it seems to have been a victim of shortsighted attempts to reduce the deficit. The program had accumulated almost $2 billion to buy and store it, and some people thought it wasn't needed.

When it comes to Trump, many people don't trust his motives because he's shown repeatedly to do and say things that are dishonest or hide the true intent. It seems fair to ask who stands to benefit from this change in helium classification.

Moderators are a special kind of special.

I got banned from the entire site for "circumventing" subreddit bans, which was because some of my alts were fed subreddits by the algorithm that I was not supposed to be on.

vim is the reason I had to give on up using a Dvorak keyboard and switch back to Qwerty. It turns out I'm quite capable of typing text in Dvorak, but relearning the muscle-memory for all the different vim operations was a bridge too far :(

... just call them "Your Royal Highnesses" and be done with it, if you are just going to adopt whatever terminology they give you about themselves, lol

Here, I found the missing scare quotes.

That's way too logical and clearly though out.

I mean, I don't see how it helps me rant against either Republicans or tech bros, so, really now ... what good is sound, stable thinking like that?!?

That's really the key, isn't it?

Take the current employees you'd want more of, and see how they do on your interview tests. Seems pretty logical.

Perhaps, but in this case the real pressure comes from having to justify multiple trillions of dollars of debt, using a technology whose actual scope of applicability is much smaller than you've been leading investors to believe. You can practically see the flop-sweat at this point.

It's planet of short stature now

Uh oh, you said something logical and true. Prepare for the downvoting ...

But ... but ... doom? Gloom? Invincible bacteria??

"Point us to an post about a guy given a job he is clearly unqualified"

That's literally my point -- the post isn't about the person in charge of the ministry! It's about them testing Collabora and the users just having too many issues with it. I guarantee if it was the same exact story and the minister had a male name none of you would have done this deep dive and criticism.

And why do you think she is unqualified? The Minister of Digitization doesn't need to be an expert on digitization, they need to be competent at high-level management and understanding how laws and policies work. Did she do something wrong? Would someone else have somehow convinced the 37 or however many employees who tested it not to hate it?

Well said. This is a very succinct way of describing the secondary effects for everyone around someone using AI to feel "more productive". Sending people massive emails you didn't even bother to read, creating huge design documents that are just dozens of meaningless pages and offer nothing of tangible value, or asking fellow developers to reviews 50,000 line code changes you didn't write (or read), etc.

I use AI at work for development and I know that the frontier models in a harness like Claude Code are more capable than many AI critics claim but I also see the results they create in a skeptical light. For a prediction chatbot they are surprisingly good at writing software, but also surprisingly bad compared to a decently skilled human. They can generate massive amounts of design documents and code in a very short time, and easily overwhelm humans trying to read, review, verify, and test the changes. The same thing is happening in other kinds work as well.

Drug use is an apt metaphor. The Dr Feelgood of this decade.

Yeah but for some reason Slashdot commenters jump to targeting people mentioned in the stories when they have a female first name.