It was the "news" sites that did it to themselves.

The quality of what passes for "journalism" these days is pretty dog shit - 90% of the articles on big name news sites (CNN, CTV etc...) don't even provide actual information, they just sanctimoniously tell you how to feel about something, without providing the relevant details that would allow you to come to your own conclusions.

The vast majority of the current crop of "journalists" should just be outright fired and not allowed to work in the field again, then perhaps we could have real "news" again.

Buying an untested and unproven product from a startup - guarantees the fault is 100% yours.

This is not a new thing son, it was never fun, you're just slow to realize it.

Early tech adoption has been separating fools from their money for at least 30 years...

... that stupid fake voice yet? God that was fucking annoying

How would that help funnel money from the poor to the rich though?

I wouldn't diss Critters 4 if I were you, that shit's a classic

...those are two very different business models.

Truth. I use "has this been the subject of a TED talk" as a litmus test for bullshit.

If it's been in a TED talk, it's probably garbage.

...is because everything presented is guaranteed to be complete bullshit, and I like knowing what the current trendy horseshit is so I can avoid it.

...just make better movies, instead of churning out garbage.

(no text)

Right? This is one of the most useless listings I've ever seen.

Agreed, it is a pretty useless and meaningless list.

I said no text

Well, fuck me - never mind - thought I was replying to the other guy (why the fuck does Slashdot not have "edit" or "delete" posts yet FFS?)

anyway, I agree, that ToasterMonkey idiot is the bigoted one.