Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Waste of money (Score 4, Informative) 134

Wikipedia page for the F35 says: "In 2012, the total life-cycle cost for the entire U.S. fleet was estimated at US$1.51 trillion"

"Afghanistan costs 124 million a year"? Did you actually type "cost of war in afghanistan" into Google?

Some estimates put the at 14 million per hour:


Of course that's a junk new site so that figure is wrong. More reliable site put it two or three times higher than that:


Comment Re:why? (Score 1) 134

The real polluter is China, at an official 1/3, and far more likely to be close to 50%.

The one that should be putting their money into dramately lowering their emissions is China. Sadly, theirs continues to rise, while America's continues to drop.

Even now, America is under 33% coal for their electricity, while China remains around 88%.

You pulled those numbers out of your ass, eh?

Comment Re:Waste of money (Score 5, Interesting) 134

Shouldn't we be spending that money to save humanity by stopping global warming?

5 billion?

That's a drop in the ocean compared to (eg.) the military. One F35. A few days in Afghanistan. Why don't we start there instead of cutting the sciency things??

Making people interested science isn't a waste and NASA are the ones who might actually save the planet.

Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 175

So? What does that have to do with all the stupid YOLO drunkards?

If you were anywhere near as smart as you think you are you'd open a bar for the idiots to try to drink themselves to death in. Those guys get rich.

(And mostly don't drink. Plus they tend to live on small islands, drive jetskis to the 'office' and have their pick of the YOLO girls. How does your drunken life measure up to that?)

Slashdot Top Deals

Swap read error. You lose your mind.