Comment U of M should buy land elsewhere for data center (Score -1) 32
Comment Re:China virtually eliminated homicide (Score -1) 53
Comment Re:Welcome to The Future! (Score -1) 150
You're a fucking idiot. Compare the poor people of 50 years ago with the poor people of today, asshole.
It's not even close. Nobody starves in this country anymore (outside of neglect / drug use / mental problems)
Comment Re:Crisis of Trust but not in the way he thinks (Score -1) 90
....we're still left with a bunch of companies trying to vacuum-up all of the stuff that we as human beings have created in order to emulate us, with the specific goal of replacing us for their own profit.
Another Luddite moron. Are the AI's taking your shit from you or just reading it, asshat? Why do I suspect you're one of the morons who used to scream "Information wants to be free"? Sure wasn't stealing when all you slashdot assholes were downloading MP3's, was it?
Comment Re:No AGI coming, Anthropic have peaked (Score -1) 90
AI is great, and runs just fine on my local graphics card.
That is a laughably stupid statement. Your shitty local LLM may run fine for whatever bullshit you're having it do, but multi-terabyte model will have vastly more capability, you clown.
Comment Re:Great (Score -1) 177
Oh no! $500 million dollars taken away from the $275 BILLION collected in taxes. What ever will CA do without that $500 million?!?
nobody-cares.gif
Typical liberal math. What's the state's debt, asshole?
This state can't limit spending to what it brings in, so that $500M is new debt stacked on top, 'cause the cunts that run this state can't stop spending more than they bring in.
PS, the total debt load for the state is north of $1.25 trillion, fucktard. And it only ever goes up.
Comment Re:Great (Score -1) 177
Comment Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here (Score -1) 65
And say that if you've had a bug in your code for 8 years and the code is actually in production and being used then the bug wasn't all that important.
I'd have to say that's pretty much proof that you're a retard. Every bug is a potential entry point for malware or bad-actors, shit-for-brains.
Comment Re: Are you sure that's wise? (Score -1) 280
Comment Re: Could we be any more stupid? (Score -1) 81
Comment Re: oops (Score -1) 81
Comment Re:What a Clown Show! (Score -1) 51
Comment Re: "The Beating of a Liberal" (Score -1) 54
Comment Re: I scored a 100 yard touchdown (Score -1) 32
It all depends. How much "weaker"? If the weaker version is... half as difficult to break, but you found a way that speeds up your attacks by 200%.. Then you do have a real problem..
And sometimes we have those weaker encryption routines forced upon us. Do you remember the encryption hoopla of the late 1990's and early 2000's?
I do.. I remember when some websites had 128-bit encryption and some had 64 bits.. There was a whole distributed computing system that attacked a 56-bit version of DES? and busted it in.. I don't remember the amount of time it was.. But a few years later, a single computer did what took tens of thousands of machines working in tandem.
That's the question.. how much weaker? The algorithm stays the same, it's the key space that changes.. So. this MIGHT be a problem in a few more years. Better get ready to upgrade.