Compare the code, if it's similar then Claude is relying on stuff it's been trained on. If not, it's generating novel code that does the same thing.

They were government-required audit logs, tied to user accounts (21 CFR Part 11) The underlying feature is un-ban-able. We asked the companies for them so we could figure out the adoption rates of new features. Most companies didn't care. We didn't do anything else with the data.

The company I used to work for data-mined telemetry to find out what product features people actually use. Would that be banned?

Also, a data-mining ban from the government will never come, as they want that data, too.

I've seen videos of Amazon drivers chucking packages from the sidewalk onto the porch. The arc could have very well been 10'.

My wife loves Allbirds shoes. She has knee issues and they are the most comfortable walking shoes she has found. AEG is the holding company where brands go to die. Time to stock up before they start churning out expensive garbage.

You're overthinking things. You don't care about the riff-raff who hang out in the Lil' Ale'inn. You make it seem like it's easy to get a janitorial job at the facility and monitor the heck out of those who apply. Also any government workers whom seem over-eager to get their hands on documentation coming out of the site, which is all, also, disinformation, so who cares if any other country gets it.

"UFO" balloons aren't to monitor aircraft. They are to test air defense radar. How good an enemy's radar is at picking up specific signatures, say roughly cruise-missile-like, is much more useful information than aircraft capability.

I'm confusing what you want and don't want to be upwind/downwind of :)

I think it has less to do with that, and more to do with using UFOs as a disinformation campaign.

Want a cheap way to flush out spies? Leak that we have alien technology, say it's in a warehouse in the desert, and wait to see who starts poking around.

Want a cheap way to test air defense radar? Make a weirdly shaped mylar balloon that has been profiled using your own radar. Fill it up with helium and launch it downstream from a sensitive military site. Wait to see how long it takes for them to scramble fighters to check it out. All you need is a balloon, a tank of helium, and a radio you can buy online for $50.

The best analogy I can come up with, is the producers think if you like eating a small plate of chili cheese fries, you are going to love eating an entire chafing tray full of them. Sometimes you only want a bit of something. Then maybe a nice salad, or a baked potato. Then you go back to chili cheese fries later.

Is kinda goofy.

1998- MSN Everything!
2002 - XP Everything!
2005 - Live Everything!
2012 - Metro Everything!
2016 - XBox Everything!
2023 - Copilot Everything!

Not everything needs to be one thing.

Only a few manufacturers can, and some states have laws saying you must sell through a dealership.

As for buying through the manufacturer's website, it depends on what you are doing. You can configure a car and see if there is one in stock by you, in which case you can haggle with the dealership over price. If you order a custom build from the manufacturer, they will probably charge you full price, and you'll still have to pick it up from a dealership and have all those fees tacked on.

Deals from the dealership usually come from them trying to offload specific models, trims, or colors that aren't selling well. Sometimes car companies will pay dealerships to get them off of their lots to make room for more profitable or better selling vehicles. You can get some of that cash, but the dealership will try to keep as much of it as they can. If they are offering $500 off, ask for $1000, for example, because they are probably getting $1500 from the manufacturer.

ZoneAlarm used to be the go-to for this. Kinda like the NoScript browser extension for internet connections. Everything is blocked until you explicitly allow it. It used to be pretty comprehensive, but I don't know how much of the network it can control, as I know Microsoft has been disallowing easy network control access to 3rd parties since Windows 10.

Whom is pumping bitcoin? The New York Times? The journalist? Do they have significant positions in bitcoin?

What is the purpose of these articles? We think so-and-so is Satoshi. They deny it. Now what? I guess the NYT gets some clicks, but I don't see what useful information there is here.

My Kindle 3rd gen can read mobi, prc, azw, and PDFs you load in via the USB cable.