Comment Local Server (Score 1) 75
https://support.zoom.com/hc/en...
Many people will disagree with me, but I don't think patented ideas/concepts/inventions should be included in any standards.
If it's a standard it should be available for anyone who wants to make a compatible widget or device or program to use.
I'm ambivalent one way or another, but the way these standards generally work is the companies get together and hash out a standard based on various patents they hold, then form a pool to license them out under FRAND rules (Fair, Reasonable, Non-Discriminatory.)
I almost guarantee Acer's patents are "submarined," meaning they waited for the standard to come out, didn't say anything about their patents, *then* asked for licensing. I don't think they were included in developing the original 5G spec and are trying to shoehorn their way in.
let go of 75% of his engineering team
That sounds like a lot.
reducing it from four people to one
That is not a lot.
No, just one
My turn to be pedantic. What's the call sign of that station? Because CPB isn't a TV station.
which provided a lot of valuable programming
Great point! If it's valuable people will happily pay for it.
Government doesn't - or didn't, at least - run them. They funded them. If you can't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
You're right, I should have said funded. Same argument. Should the federal government be subsidizing television stations?
I think it's mainly about money and power
It's much simpler than that. There is a list of stuff the government should do. Running television stations isn't on that list for a lot of people. Nor radio stations. Nor newspapers. Nor publishing companies or social media networks.
Always leave room to add an explanation if it doesn't work out.