Flashing lights, constant noise, lack of reference points to tell where you are. Hells, even the carpets are custom designs for the casino featuring abstract patterns in contrasting colors that confuse your sense of direction.
You're right in that Vegas casinos are designed to keep people in and playing, but that has nothing to do with addictive design. The loud "winning" noises play into that, but not the confusingly laid out floor plans.
At any rate, the trend is away from that style of casino floor. The Bellagio and Wynn casino floors are clean and neatly laid out. The Wynn even has windows. Ditto the Aria.
Because while those services do exist (typically using the FAST approach for older content with lower licensing costs), they do not always cover what some people want to view (I am guessing things like ESPN).There is, and will continue to be, a disconnect between what consumers are willing to pay, and what the owners expect to receive in revenue, for the content being produced.
Ah, that makes sense. My disconnect is that, while flipping through pay TV channels which I have access to them, I don't find any more programs to watch than when flipping through the free IPTV channels. The sports-heads I know just spring for the streaming package for whatever local team they want to watch.
Many people will disagree with me, but I don't think patented ideas/concepts/inventions should be included in any standards.
If it's a standard it should be available for anyone who wants to make a compatible widget or device or program to use.
I'm ambivalent one way or another, but the way these standards generally work is the companies get together and hash out a standard based on various patents they hold, then form a pool to license them out under FRAND rules (Fair, Reasonable, Non-Discriminatory.)
I almost guarantee Acer's patents are "submarined," meaning they waited for the standard to come out, didn't say anything about their patents, *then* asked for licensing. I don't think they were included in developing the original 5G spec and are trying to shoehorn their way in.
let go of 75% of his engineering team
That sounds like a lot.
reducing it from four people to one
That is not a lot.
No, just one
My turn to be pedantic. What's the call sign of that station? Because CPB isn't a TV station.
which provided a lot of valuable programming
Great point! If it's valuable people will happily pay for it.
Government doesn't - or didn't, at least - run them. They funded them. If you can't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
You're right, I should have said funded. Same argument. Should the federal government be subsidizing television stations?
"Why should we subsidize intellectual curiosity?" -Ronald Reagan