So Citizens United in effect argued corporations should have privileges humans enjoy (donating cash to campaigns). What about data centers? I mean, individual data centers, outside of ownership? The thinking goes: the US invested/invests in these data centers and has a stake in AI-producing companies, who in turn depend on data centers. Clip the data centers and you clip AI, so they are national importance, on par with the corporations above them.

Economics: export/import -> fiscal policy -> cultural corporate products (Microsoft, apple, GE, etc) And above is a class of artificial intelligence software writhing through and over, and encompassing, these forces, impacting them, I wonder, how?

You know what isn't a bad idea is a requirement that to obtain a driver's license, you must first pass a (simple) video game. The game doesn't have to be difficult--you want to go from A to B? Do it on the video game and show how it's done.

I had a hard time figuring out where the problem was because the summary left out the detail that ai-training on books destroys them without saving the data (the book lettering, i guess) in the process. That's a big detail to leave out. I mean, I don't know if I have an issue if it's otherwise--that, during the course of it, the books are digitized and made available. But that's something that I can understand people would argue against, i.e., they believe the loss of a physical copy of a rare book is something to avoid. Totally understandable. However, isn't a valid counteragument that the bookseller's prerogative whether to sell a book or not?

If blockchain is effective at checking and moving forward bits of information, is there a way to portal that idea over to other areas of information technology? /compiling!

Really have no idea how this would work or feasible or what not, but...bitcoin miners are on their way out, does this have potential?

yup, this seems really like a 'contact-your-friendly-representative' regardless of political affiliation thing

So airlines deploy Guile to eliminate sonic booms? That's his best move!

Drone rocketry carrying toxic payload to the moon. What could go wrong?

What about a solution where discontinued games are opened up? An agreement where game companies post source-code or whatever in return for shutting down servers?

Perhaps a fly-by of Pluto is what's called for.

You know how Mozilla's 'going all-in' on AI? Wouldn't it be pretty cool if you had a browser solely for education? Like, every action, premeditated or otherwise, would inform the user on things that just happened and/or link you to things that relate to that previous action. But otherwise, I don't think that this merger can be all bad. Sounds pretty helpful

Honestly? A great use of ChatGPT. 1: ChatGPT will always fail the turing test. Hands down, so using it for this endeavor is a waste. 2: ChatGPT is native to set-in-stone programs (i.e., the opposite of human encounters). You input directions with a crutch of 3rd party software, and the bot gets you where you want.

[Begin some AI program output]: This source explores the concept of creating dynamic, unique art on a computer desktop using mouse pointers. It proposes an evolution from the traditional single-cursor interaction to a system where two hands and two mice could manipulate on-screen elements. The core idea is to develop a program that visualizes the "shadow-motion" of the pointer, using AI to dynamically present how existing desktop programs and icons change in response to mouse movement, creating a superficial "sheen" or effect without altering the underlying functionality. This process would generate completely original and unique visual art based on user input, time, and desktop configuration, effectively turning everyday computer use into a creative act ---- Say what you will about the interactive chat bots (really dumb), the code behind what produced this is pretty impressive.

Threat is just one letter off from treat, after all.