You know how Mozilla's 'going all-in' on AI? Wouldn't it be pretty cool if you had a browser solely for education? Like, every action, premeditated or otherwise, would inform the user on things that just happened and/or link you to things that relate to that previous action. But otherwise, I don't think that this merger can be all bad. Sounds pretty helpful

Honestly? A great use of ChatGPT. 1: ChatGPT will always fail the turing test. Hands down, so using it for this endeavor is a waste. 2: ChatGPT is native to set-in-stone programs (i.e., the opposite of human encounters). You input directions with a crutch of 3rd party software, and the bot gets you where you want.

[Begin some AI program output]: This source explores the concept of creating dynamic, unique art on a computer desktop using mouse pointers. It proposes an evolution from the traditional single-cursor interaction to a system where two hands and two mice could manipulate on-screen elements. The core idea is to develop a program that visualizes the "shadow-motion" of the pointer, using AI to dynamically present how existing desktop programs and icons change in response to mouse movement, creating a superficial "sheen" or effect without altering the underlying functionality. This process would generate completely original and unique visual art based on user input, time, and desktop configuration, effectively turning everyday computer use into a creative act ---- Say what you will about the interactive chat bots (really dumb), the code behind what produced this is pretty impressive.

Threat is just one letter off from treat, after all.

It's weird that media on the internet follows a sine-wave pattern: first it was everything available (if you knew where), then most content was available, except some restricted by region, then almost all was restricted except through subscription, and we're sitting at a place where like, fifty-fifty subscription/freewatch.