The real issue here isnt just AI noise, it's contextless identity.
Anyone with a ChatGPT prompt and a HackerOne login can throw slop at Daniel Stenbergs inbox.
Theres no way to filter for intent, effort, or history. Thats the problem we need to solve and maybe its finally time for a web3 reputation layer for the internet.
Let users link their identity across systems (GitHub, Stack Overflow, bug trackers, etc.) to a Web3 address
Generate a reputation profile: merged PRs, accepted bug reports, Karma, vouches, prior bounties, blah blah
Store that reputaiton signed off-chain (cheap, privacy-friendly), and optionally allow the address owner to pay gas to sign or pin proofs on-chain (Ethereum, EAS, etc.) if tamper resistance is needed.
Platforms like HackerOne could then gate access, weigh reports, or skip low-rep users or require a tiny stake to discourage spam while still welcoming newcomers who have done the work.
This isn't about trying to force blockchain in to a use case, but it could be the basis for a portable, verifiable reputation that the user can control and share with any site, forum or service.
Daniel could then flag users as using AI to create negative reputation and discourage it's use. He could also filter and prioritise reports from confirmed good actors.
And we, the mighty multi decade users of slashdot could represent our hard won karma ...
This would eliminate 95% of the garbage with out banning AI or disincentivising new talent. It would reduce team burnout.
We could add our Steam and Playstation achievements to our account so someone might actually care about that knife skin you bought...
I dunno, just a thought