Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:article (Score 1, Funny) 224

Agreed, but it scares me that obly 44% of Apples tech employees have this feeling.. If ANY company should have many, then it ought to be them

Summary says of 44% all employees at Apple feel like imposters and we know that over half of the total are marketers or lawyers. Suddenly the headphone jack removal/Apple Watch/cordless mouse with charging plug on bottom/etc. all starts to makes sense.

Comment Intel processor numbers (Score 1) 184

Seeing as it took Intel so long to go from i3 to i5 to i7 processors to only now releasing i9s they have a long way to go to get back to the glory version number days of i386.

In all seriousness though, I've kind of given up on making sense of the processor/GPU models and just paste it in Google to see the specs and compare that with another one I am already familiar with.

Comment Re:Introductions should be comprehensible (Score 1) 304

Makes a lot of sense from a PhD in physics holder like yourself -- I mean, why go into all the nitty-gritty details on things most people will never understand just because a concept may be tough to understand properly?

As a fellow student of physics and knowing that Wikipedia is open to all I will be suggesting this more broadly comprehensible revision:

Electroweak interaction:
Once upon a time there were separate ideas for how small particles would interact with each other if they were charged up differently or becoming unstable because they had too many parts to them spinning around a centre bit.

The "elecroweak interaction" is the combination of these things into one combined thing. A particle may be charged ("electro") or weakly able to hold on to all its parts ("weak"). If you put the 2 together you get "electroweak".

Comment Re:I don't doubt that being a billionaire (Score 1) 427

The parent comment seems particularly insightful and reminds me of former USA president Barack Obama's detailed description for the cameras of the operation to take out terrorist Osama Bin Laden. The idea if I get it right was to project that this country was so far ahead of others it could say openly what its intelligence services were doing. I wonder if this might ironically make it weak long term if this keeps happening and other countries don't do this.

Comment Re:Watch Pandora's Promise (Score 1) 389

In the article the GP linked to it says that the exposure to the general public from coal flyash is 10 times more radioactive than from a similar generating capacity nuclear power plant, but also is much less than the background radiation you would get anyway by being alive on earth.

Too bad that's not how radiation works. It's not the coal ash radiation or the background radiation. It's the coal ash radiation and the background radiation. Further, that complete bullshit is based on averages, but radioactive material comes in discrete particles, it doesn't arrive in the real world as an average.

I'm only distilling what was in the linked to article from Scientific American.

The idea is that by burning the coal you are left with a concentrated fly ash that contains a higher density of radioactive material that was present already (i.e. by burning the not as radioactive part). This is then released into the environment and adds less than a millionth or something like this to the background radiation (note this is not uniform over earth) -- which would probably be the equivalent of moving towards the equator by a very small countries worth in Europe like Luxembourg. But what do I know, I only have an honors in computational physics.

Comment Re:Watch Pandora's Promise (Score 1) 389

If flyash is that radioactive, why isn't it mined for nuclear fuel?

Because it mainly contains materials unsuited to fission power (such as radon or undesirable isotopes of uranium/thorium) and in low quantities. In the article the GP linked to it says that the exposure to the general public from coal flyash is 10 times more radioactive than from a similar generating capacity nuclear power plant, but also is much less than the background radiation you would get anyway by being alive on earth.

Comment Re: Drupal is revolting (Score 1) 95

How about the Banshee PHP CMF?

Yeah... you may want to start scrolling down the Google images of Banshee and look up CMF (see definition 2 and my humble apologies in advance) before you recommend this to your boss as a safe substitute for Drupal.

I know some people might argue that this is an unfair generalization from one developer to the whole project; that Drupal insn't entirely about screwing you in gratuitous and unpleasant ways you can't escape from. Oh, who's kidding -- this was their plan all along.

Comment Re:Vulcan? (Score 1) 202

Ignoring the feasibility of this, if this were to happen mental clarity and focus training will be in high demand.

This is one possible outcome. However, surely it is more likely to be that once you connect with your respected fellow humans in the new Internet of thoughts images of breasts and cocks come popping into your head.

Comment Re:bullshit (Score 1) 474

As others have pointed out your "megawatt" should be a kilowatt, but also you have not factored in full costs such as any battery storage or electrical starter unit, etc. over the 20 year period

Solar power is nice to see improved, but ain't going to make all the cool things from science fiction a reality (like wireless power and the like). It has long been a matter of personal opinion of where we should go as humans with consumption of resources such as power, either towards a more "sustainable" society which uses less and is "able to live within its means" or using more power and hoping that new technologies make life better for future generations. I would personally like to see much greater power generation and take some solace in that both approaches will likely be tried at the same time if history is anything to go on.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Help Mr. Wizard!" -- Tennessee Tuxedo

Working...