Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Silly. (Score 2) 75

Even if battery energy density started getting close to that of liquid hydrocarbons, and thats a looong way off still, youd still need more batteries than you would fuel because batteries dont get lighter as they discharge like burned fuel does, rocket equation stuff. A 747 carries ~150k kilograms of fuel, if that didnt burn off thats an extra 37k kg the first quarter of the flight, an extra 75k kg the first half of the flight and so on...

Battery planes may never make widespread sense, if we ever start generating enough carbon free energy cheaply enough and even if all ground transport goes battery electric or whatever, at some point it might still be worth it to just make carbon neutral jet fuel with air fuel synthesis. That seems closer on the horizon than the battery tech needed for large planes to be feasible, hard to beat jet turbines for that application.

Comment Re:Exactly 10x (Score 1) 89

I know everybody turns off any new features immediately upon release, but with the new(ish) agent the way some of the various bits and pieces have come together has been pretty great.

Credits are global now, so youre watching something "why does he look familiar?", you click down to the actor now it shows you their whole filmography, you can watchlist stuff right there, and even a little category 'Youve seen them in' with anything with them in any of your libraries youve watched by recent. Not just other shows if youre watching a show or only other movies if youre watching movies. And since you can just search and browse through anything/anyone now, its actually replaced IMDB for me just because its sooo much cleaner. https://watch.plex.tv/person/n... vs https://www.imdb.com/name/nm00...

And speaking of the watchlist, thats universal now, you can search and add stuff you dont have, from any service, even stuff thats not on any service, and the watchlist can interface directly with the *arrs, so youre looking up that guy from that thing, watchlist another of his movies, radarr goes and does its thing. You can add upcoming stuff too and they even have trailers now, so i dont have to go to Youtube anymore cuz it doesnt make me wade through 20 fake AI trailers before finding the one on the actual studios channel and then it doesnt autoplay some assholes reaction or breakdown of the trailer i just watched right after.

AND if your users have their watchlists public, you can monitor theirs too, so friends and family can just watchlist stuff you dont have without leaving the plex app, so you dont need to try to convince them to use a third party app like Omni to request stuff.

All the other social features still suck tho, their own lack of features makes you abuse the rating system as a filter for other things instead of as a rating system, but replacing IMDB and youtube for at least my purposes has been pretty nice. Some of my users dont have their watchlists public either so i still have a facebook group chat for requests cuz who wants to use some third party app for requests. .

$750 is ridiculous tho, i paid $100 during a 50% off sale a couple of black fridays ago, but with all my collections and playlists and everything and especially all my users switching to Jellyfin wouldnt be as simple as everyone pretends, but if in the future they roll out Plex2 to loophole my lifetime or try to charge my users individually ill figure it out.

Comment Apple. Cloud. (Score 1) 58

People hand themselves over to Apple in toto. People hand themselves over to some "cloud" or other, in toto.

Why?

Why would any presumably sane person ever do such a thing?

It's already plenty more than bad enough to give away such little as I'm giving away here and now with this comment.

But to hand it all over?

How can people possibly bring themselves to believe things like this could ever end well for them?

I cannot fathom the least of it. It is beyond senseless. It is beyond imagining.

And yet people do it. Every day. In droves.

Comment Re:Millions you say (Score 1) 44

The ones with actual users ...

These are the sort of self-generating monopolies I've seen in the past 25 years of the internet.

Effectively, everyone goes there because everyone goes there.

A bit more than herd mentality, but makes any startup something which requires large amounts of energy to succeed and then keep going. Never stop.

Twitter has self-inflicted wounds, thanks Elon, but continues to limp along. I find myself less likely to visit because -- not everyone is there any more.

Comment "writers, designers, artists, and communicators" (Score 2, Funny) 68

Read every single comment, all the way down to -1.

Nobody has addressed " What I'd really like to see more of are more non-technical contributors. I mean, yes, we can always benefit from more packagers and coders and engineers, but I think what we really need desperately are writers, designers, artists, videographers, communicators, organizers and planners. ".

Linux has a HUGE communication problem.

Linux not only has a huge communication problem, it steadfastly refuses to even entertain the possibility that communication is even something that requires any kind of serious and polished attention in the first place.

And it fails horribly, with the general populace, right there.

Linux fails to accept that there are "iron laws" of communication, and in so doing, breaks all of them, and in so doing, loses the general populace, who will never in their lives sit still for being talked to, will never sit still for being communicated with, be it linguistically, be it visually, or be it any other way, in the manner in which Linux everlastingly insists in attempting to communicate with them, and then goes off scratching its head, wondering why people "don't get it."

The problem is Linux, not the people.

And by "Linux" I mean the entire community of people who design, build, and implement it.

A minority of which, being so vanishingly small as to not even show up when you're actually looking for them, who actually can communicate, but who exist in numbers so small, and constitute a fraction of the total body of people who design, build, and implement, which is so small that it disappears altogether from sensible view.

An example of one of the “iron laws” of communication, for all the hard-heads out there who double down on their refusal to accept or accede to such things.

If they’re not laughing, then it’s not funny.

Period.

It does not matter if you think it’s funny. Keep it to yourself, if you think it’s funny. Fine and dandy. No worries, mate. But the instant you open your mouth and communicate it to someone else, it had better damn well cause them to laugh or it’s not funny.

Period.

And right here is where Linux fails so horribly as to cause people, normal people, members of the general populace, to cringe deeply, and recoil from Linux as if it was something with a disease that they fear catching if they stay too close to it for too long.

And don’t forget, hard-heads, that I’m not just talking about humor. I’m only using my example of The Iron Law of Humor in an effort to simplify things to the point where even hard-heads can figure it out.

The failures of Linux to communicate, the failures of Linux to engage successfully with the general populace, the failures of Linux to abide by The Iron Laws of Communication, are so vast in scope as to defy enumerating them all.

All the little in-groups in Linux have all their little in-group ways, and inside the group, it’s all so very wonderful, and everything is seen through rose-colored glasses.

But nobody ever seems to want to step outside and find out what the general populace might be thinking about it.

Which is unfortunate to an extreme, because the general populace is having none of it.

The general populace despises all the “cutsey” crap that Linux insists in wrapping itself up in, all of which is clearly (as seen by the general populace) the creation of lamers, social misfits, and tone-deaf idiots, from one end to the other, without exception.

Another example.

“GNU's Not Unix.”

GNU’s not funny, either.

And recursive acronyms constitute felony assault against any attempt to engage with, bond with, or even communicate with the general populace.

And the lameness of the logo that’s associated with GNU is enough to take your breath away. People. Think. It’s. Lame.

And it is.

And that’s only a single example.

It’s only a single egregious faux pas in attempting to communicate with the general populace, among too many to count.

And the penguin is lame, sitting there on it’s ass, feet stuck out in front of it in a posture no real penguin will ever be seen sitting in, with a blank look of deep stupidity on it’s face.

And you people have bonded with it.

You people have bonded with the very thing that causes everybody else in the world to view you with contempt.

To view you as lamers and losers.

And this is the first thing that people see when they’re introduced to Lunux.

And that fox-thing, or dog-thing, or whateverthehellitis-thing that’s plastered across a program that’s called “GIMP”? GIMP ???

No

We’re not even going to be talking about a thing which is that lame.

People hate that crap. They HATE it.

And Linux hates that it’s hated, right back, and right there, all communication with the general populace is ended, and all chance of integrating with the general populace is destroyed.

You like your little cutesy naming conventions.

You like your little cutesy visuals.

You like your incomprehensibly-opaque lingo with little in-group hooks and jokes buried inside of it.

You like all of it.

Ok.

Fine.

Whatever you want. It’s all good.

Just don’t be coming out here with it, attempting to shove it in our faces, expecting that we are going to be liking it too, because we don’t.

You wanna come out here and engage with us, then you’ll do it on our terms, or you won’t do it at all.

You’ll learn how to be engaging on our terms, or you won’t be engaging at all.

And if you want to learn how to be engaging, then the first thing you’ll do is to recognize the seriousness of it all, and stop giving a bunch of amateurs and lamers total control over it.

Hand that kind of work over to the kind of people who know the discipline, and who know how to implement it, in the exact same way you hand coding over to the kind of people who know the discipline and who know how to implement it.

No difference.

None at all.

The exterior surface of Linux, the part that the general populace sees, is the ugliest, and least-engaging, and most impossible to understand, part of the entire operation.

The part that people see FIRST.

WHY?

Why insist on a thing like that?

If you’re going to communicate well then communicate.

Nothing less will do.

Nothing less will ever stand a chance of working.

Obey the Iron Laws of Communication, or go back inside where you came from and quit bemoaning the fact that the rest of us out here are never going to be signing on for your whatever it is that you’re doing, because whatever it is, it’s very definitely not communication.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you have to ask how much it is, you can't afford it.

Working...