Comment Diss all you want, but there's open data (Score 5, Informative) 283
China's note verbale: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/oo... . The US's note verbale for Starlink-1095: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en... , and for Starlink-2305: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en... . Both, as well as many other Starlink satellites, were expected to operate at about 350km. Then according to https://in-the-sky.org/spacecr... , and some other similar websites whose owners are neither Chinese nor American, Starlink-1095 ascended to 550km before plunging back to around 350km, and malfunctioning (no evidence, only from enthusiasts) and decaying. I don't like that particular govt, those poor brainwashed souls included, but we need to be better than this.
