Undoubtedly social media use by kids is problematic and it's not something that can be handled just by parents. If all the other kids are communicating through social media, banning your kid is isolating them from their peer group.
But requiring identification to use communication tools is bound to be implemented poorly. Type your age doesn't work, but anything more rigorous is step closer to an Orwellian future.
Or Gabby Giffords, the White House Correspondents Dinner, the 16 mailed pipe bombs in 2018, Boulder Colorado molotov incident...
Yeah, I definitely didn't make a comprehensive list, was just a few off the top of my head.
I'll be honest, you won't be able to convince me that hate speech isn't a thing. I was on a jury and had to hear two children sobbing as they retold the story about how they were told that their racial group should die and were called unrepeatable slurs. As I watched the perpetrator stare murderous darts at them. That they were found guilty of an offense with a hate crime modifier was undoubtedly deserved.
Sure, there's some politically incorrect statements, off color, or generally assholery that obviously shouldn't be prosecuted as hate speech. Or that there are fraught topics or absolutism in discussion like religious violence.
But I never will be able to forget little girl tears in order to be able to find that hate speech has no meaning.
much like that of iPad and iPhone.
Uh, huh. That means it's a little different...
they never promised dual boot
This isn't what's been talked about though. No of course they didn't promise dual boot. An unsupported community project is making that happen. And of course Apple can change their process and break Asahi, because that's exactly what happened...
And you're still off in la la la about GPL stuff. Completely ignoring history like Yellow Dog Linux where Terra Soft was allowed to sell Macs with Linux and GPL software on them...
All this to say that Apple has allowed it run up to this point. No, they don't have obligation to continue to allow it, but they probably will. And all of this has nothing to do with the GPL or lack of agreements.
If you can't argue it, argue the semantics of it.
The US Supreme court couldn't define obscene. So that's why my email signature is goatse, because no one can tell me it's obscene.
Gift cards for a specific purpose feel better as gift because the intention of giving someone a luxury beyond what they normally spend on.
So a card or note with directed intention of how to spend the money could be a fix to any tacky feeling.
Can I find it ironic that your original complaint was basically about needing to being politically correct, but that we need to put "hate speech" on the euphemism rollercoaster of political correctness?
I mean come on, even if we exclude any content on the edges. Do you really think that there haven't been more truly hateful things said on that platform with relaxed rules?
For all of the threats to public servants, no one has actually been killed, right?
Maybe you haven't been paying attention, but yes people have died or had assassination attempts made on them. To think that the political discourse doesn't have real world effects is naive.
But the point still stands on the more global scale that adapters make incompatible charging networks a total non-issue. So as long as there's are other stations, one network shutting down isn't a big deal.
There's nothing stopping you from solely charging at Tesla chargers already. A NACS / CCS adapter is only $170. So if you want to just charge at Tesla chargers regardless of your car or adapters there's not much of an issue outside of how annoyingly short the cords are.
My personal experience however is that Tesla chargers are the most expensive and the convenience of having more options outweighs the minor hassle of an extra phone app. Having to drive even 20 minutes out of the way on a road trip would be way more annoying.
The capacity per car isn't changing much. So that battery is just evening out how quick each car charges and maybe that there's some car getting chargers because they don't have to wait.
I've been at charging stations with 24 superchargers that don't even have this new tech to level things out. So probably not going to be the issue you are imagining here. And if they are limited on power, the worst thing that's going to happen is that charging slows down to that lower level, not a biggie to just Supercharge rather than "Flash charge"...
Why would it be surprising that Apple only allows approved system software to run on a Mac?
The devices don't have a locked bootloader, you might be thinking of iOS devices that need to be jail-broken.
Do you know what the main roadblock for Asahi is? It is the fact that they can't sign an agreement with Apple as Microsoft did.
Windows for ARM doesn't run on current Apple Silicon. Boot Camp support ended 6 years ago with the end of Intel hardware. Which with Intel hardware had support by most of the main distros.
It's just a negative side effect of the GPL.
The license really isn't the issue. Apple just doesn't have much incentive to release documentation to it's silicon when it wants to sell the vertically integrated platform. But if they really cared, they wouldn't leave the bootloader unlocked in the first place...
"Time is money and money can't buy you love and I love your outfit" - T.H.U.N.D.E.R. #1