For some reason, I don't think this is foreshadowing saner regulation. Just less.

Was mostly one dude from Giant Swarm maintaining it with a some commits from Isovalent and Red Hat. All of this in duplication to the OSS version F5 already makes and fully supports (which you can of course upgrade to the commercial version for more features).

• If you aren't using any NGINX specific annotations on your Ingress objects, than basically any of the other providers that support Ingress objects are probably going to work just as well.

• If you are using annotations, than migrating over to the new Gateway API is going to make things less complicated and then yet again the providers that support that API are probably going to work just as well

• If you are just looking for the most popular implementation for small k8s, that's probably Traefik which is what k3s uses by default and k0s provides a guide for. And it's available for your distro makes available as an "addon". Which again as long as your not doing anything goofy with annotations, is likely to just work (and be able to do more).

More like, "This old style is still supported by the maker and we've been trying to get people to use the new standard for years. There's multiple good options already. But if there's enough people in the community that want to use the old style that duplicates the free commercial offering, that's great take over. But it's not a good use of limited support resources."

Absolutely is that. And anyone who still wants to use the old Ingress API with NGINX can just use F5's implementation. Paying to support a product based on the old API when the maker of the product already release that is a waste of resources.

But since it is a confusing topic, it makes it seem like "oh no they are getting rid of NGINX". Rather than the more nuanced take of:

• If you are doing special stuff with provider specific Ingress annotations that makes you dependent on a implementation, you should have switched over to the new Gateway API that natively handles nearly all of the cases.

• If you aren't doing anything advanced, then whenever your distribution changes the default provider it's unlikely to cause any issues.

• If you are doing something advanced and you don't want to change, then the maker of NGINX has a drop in replacement (for which you can pay for extra bells and whistles).

• Finally there has been years of the community taking feedback, improving, and trying to make the transition to Gateway API smooth. Then advocating for the use of the new more powerful and standardized API. So if this is a topic that matters to your org, then this shouldn't be a sudden unexpected move.

It's not a huge surprise with the open driver being easier and better than the proprietary Nvidia, with AI / CUDA development being the cash cow for Nvidia and Linux gaming being a relatively low volume revenue source.

At least with Cloudflare, you know that there's going to be a thorough RCA and then post-mortem will be public. They might have gotten too big and too much of the internet is dependent on them, but the reasons why they got that big are pretty clear. There should be more competitors paying attention and emulating, as they do a lot right and having more people be open about good engineering would make for a healthy and more competitive space.

Stronger punishment is the smaller part of the equation of deterrence. It's the feeling of risk versus the likelihood of getting caught.
We need to encourage improvements in enforcing the rule of law and good international police partnership. At the same time without discouraging infringing liberties and privacy. Simply being harder on crime doesn't solve the problem.

Next up is the dream commercial for Lightspeed brand briefs.

Just gotta contract out the unpopular parts and then don't have to be responsible for any of the blame. Definitely not an industry wide issue...

This is of course coming from the guy who released classified information to the press on a non-government messaging service.

No need even for AI scariness, Viva Insightshas been part of the M365 suite well before Copilot. And here's their privacy policy on it

OpenAI doesn't share parameter information. OpenAI doesn't share parameter information.

Having worked for one of those Indian IT Service providers and seen how they have treated their off-shore employees. I sure won't be losing sleep if they get a little extra tax that helps pay for the damage that they have caused.

Teacher might say that Johnny has behavior problems and is failing the class. That evidence may be provided by the parents to the doctor, who then can make the diagnosis along with lot of other criteria. At no point does the teacher talk to the doctor... Nor does the doctor force the child to take medication.

As a male with ADHD who had a hard time sitting still in class, no I am not going to pretend that there are not difficulties with modern education and male development or people with ADHD. And like everything else ADHD is a set of normal human behaviors and experiences taken to disorder. High activity in boys is normal behavior and does cause issues in class. It also takes more than just hyperactivity to be diagnosed.

But that's the thing, private schools aren't required to take the kids with disabilities or behavior disorders.

I don't take umbrage with school choice, nor do I believe that public schools are unfettered by shedding children of conservatives. Many public school educators are religious and conservative. Further my personal experience in a extremely religious and conservative college tell me that your proposed solution is less effective than you are proposing. Closeted gay kids of conservatives that couldn't talk about their sexuality with their parents didn't suddenly become straight after reaching the end of high school. (And not for lack of trying, those conversion camps or talks from Exodus International sure weren't effective)

However the issue is ending the financial responsibility for supporting the public system, just like how someone without children still has to pay taxes. Because paying isn't about your kid, but about your neighbor's. Secondly those schools need to have the same requirements to have a good education. Like having qualified teachers or taking kids with disabilities / behavioral disorders. Or not shoving a kid into a room to read religious propaganda books without a teacher.

Again, I called no one names and you were responding to me. No, being in support of private schools doesn't make one a racist or a religious zealot. That said inverse can be true, there are plenty of people who are those things and are in support of private schools because of those beliefs. People who are White Supremacists would want private schools, let's not forget "Separate but equal" and school integration. They would have no concern for how their actions would affect other peoples children.

All said, if people uphold their civic responsibility for having everyone's children have the opportunity for quality education, then I have no objection to people choosing to go to the school of their choice including religious or private schools.