Some people just are poor at remembering a face or putting it together with a name...and some get that way as they age. Could someone who realizes that they are starting to lose it wear the glasses so their problems would not be noticed so easily?
Great! I like that. I'd proposed THOSE people should get a prescription for the advantage of this augmentation to help them live a more normal life. Kind of like ppl get a handicap parking sticker, or some people get prescription narcotics to help them live a functionally "normal" life. Letting anyone have this is chaos. But then, I suppose, because of the world we live in, ppl would abuse the system and claim they have a problem to gain access to this new super power for nefarious purposes.... OR, hey, how about a financial gate - set the bar really high to limit the access... or a moral subscription gate, so YOU, the wearer are tracked and tagged while using it to even the playing field... I dunno - something seems one-sided about all this.
And don't blame the one who replaced you at the employer, but blame the employer for replacing you and prioritising greed.
It's not always the employers fault - sure larger corps are greedy, but smaller ones need to compete by making financial choices - the good of the one vs the good of the many.... If I have 50 people in my company and one of them is an "American born" resource who is failing to keep up his/her skills, and along comes a prospect with better skills at a lower cost, why should I keep the "Slacker". Would it be different if the replacement were American born? Don't get me wrong, I'd prefer the local variety for so many reasons, but if the company is at stake and I might shut my doors as a result of employing over-payed under skilled American workers. touch decisions.
To save the environment we have to ruin it? At what point during building, construction, and production does the cost of it all eclipse the savings of ICE over EV? For a small savings in carbon (if any when including the significant environmental toll of the battery) is it worth building entire datacenters, no wait, entire power plants just to power AI to power the thinking behind this eco saver car?
What does AI have to do with "this eco saver car" - you are crossing topics. This topic has to do with powering AI datacenters, not electric cars.
I apologize for my generalization to "all people that haul things". My point is, not having a longer bed option cuts out a significant part of the market. For me, that's a deal breaker.
Specifically, I'm referring to yards of mulch, loads of firewood, long lumber (over 10' without it being too sketchy), helping friends move that have too much shit,
Agreed. Silverado with the Midgate checks all your boxes. But Ford was using Off the shelf parts, so I give them a pass at their first go.
I think it's a good thing. EVs are a dead end and they use SO MANY RARE EARTH METALS. People think petrol emissions are bad, lithium mining is horrific and it's expanding all over the US. Global warming is bullshit and replacing everything with batteries is impractical and will end up causing more pollution.
Really? How?
A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.