I want underlined letters on buttons or labels so that I can navigate and activate GUI elements by keyboard without having to use the mouse. Some people don't have the same range of motion so this helps with accessibility, some power users want to input things quickly without having to use the mouse, and some want to make macros that repeat keystrokes to automate certain things easily.

"AI isn't going to replace people, it's going to replace people"

Sounds like it will be replacing people. Everything before the comma is a lie.

Eventually they will kill Notepad for the same reasons they killed Wordpad, and then re-invent Notepad again for the same reasons people just want plain old Notepad.

Are there less jobs requiring them, and turning away thoae with degrees who would demand a higher pay?

You recognize the show fading to black after a moment has concluded, an obvious point in the show for an ad break, so you tune out. We've been trained to recognize these.

There are bound to be a lot of scams on the app store with third party payment systems, and you never know how long Joe Blow's payment service is going to stick around and even be there to support their customers or what types of policies they have for customer satisfaction.

The CEO who needs to capitulate to investors who found a shiny new buzzword, and OEMs who need an excuse to sell people something new

Aren't software developers going to start asking why this won't be the case on other closed systems?

At the same time now people might have to worry about malware, different payment methods and satisfaction policies, stores that just shut down and disappear with no support left for software people paid for, removing the convenience and changing expectations of the experience people will have with these devices.

It seems like a can of worms and I wonder what will happen.

Cutting through all the red tape to get something done seems like a romantic idea. It can seem weak and toothless to some people for our officials to comply with the bureaucracy that is in place. Some people are cheering specifically because of disruptive behavior that has the air of clout and moving mountains to accomplish things that people are worked up about. They think things must be done with great urgency and if the result isn't achieved we are doomed, and don't consider other things that could also result from brash action.

The red tape exists because we agreed it should be there. Policies and laws were ratified specifically to protect against concerns and pitfalls that people had. They were designed to prevent abuse, error, and potential security issues. People were brought on to help craft these with intent, the public could be solicited for their opinion, these were things all designed with consensus and purpose.

Cutting through that just to accomplish what you want will lead to a lot of the things we had been trying to safeguard against.

Change can be slow, but it always is when trying to ensure care and thought and consideration, and that red tape was put there by us because of the concerns we had that things could go wrong.

 
One reason is that these tariffs didn't exist.... but showing the tariffs would help convince Americans to buy products made in the USA, so it's weird that the government would be against showing them. But maybe they don't want people to think about that because they want to collect the tariffs because that is more money going to the government.

It has been a long time that we are missing RAM slots on a GPU board.

With Nvidia setting limits that 3rd party OEMs aren't allowed to surpass, the GPU has been fixed and there is not enough competition on the high end. AMD is looking viable now at least for enthusiast gamers.

With x86 licenses being short, the APU market does not have enough competition either.

The AI is taking copyright work and using it for commercial purposes. If AI was open and free to the people and not patented or proprietary, then I would be more likely to accept that AI has the same rights as the average person to these works.

I actually like the natural looking portraits, they look more human and less phony.

Shouldn't automated vehicles follow the laws exactly unless it is dangerous to do so (i.e. when necessary to use a safe but illegal way to avoid a dangerous situation)

They should not second guess the law and should not make mistakes by patterning behavior after others who make mistakes.

The post probably meant to link to this story

Another interesting read is this one by the same author titled "Why Xbox customers are right to be angry about Microsoft putting more 'exclusive' games on Nintendo or PlayStation"