"Folks have been complaining about GNOME's UI choices for well over 20 years now."

GNOME 3, which brought the huge changes in UI as compared with GNOME 2, is about 13 years old, not twenty.

Central Park is "publicly available," but that doesn't mean you have the right to cut down the trees in it and sell them for lumber. The AI companies are selling lumber and when you ask them where they got it, they shrug and say "publicly available sources."

It's confusing because of non-unique names, but I haven't been able to find a CV, bio, or publication list... nothing to confirm that he is at NASA, was at NASA, or that he's the top electrostatics expert at NASA.

If the Future "Fund" didn't have a endowment--an endowment in the form of cash "fiat" money--or at least a portfolio of conservative assets denominated in "fiat" money--then it was always a shaky reed. If they were gambling on their research funding coming from promise of future cash flow, from investment activity based on FTT play money, then they need to be big boys and accept their gambling losses for what they are.

The people openly supporting this are the current Board of Directors. They are attempting to consolidate their power by implementing a system in which the outgoing Board picks the incoming Board. The Board does not post any of the minutes of their Board meetings. They do not post copies of any of the policies. When folks have asked for copies of the minutes, they were told it is the policy of the organization not to post those. When asked to see a copy of that policy, they have responded that it is policy of the organization not to share copies of the policies. In other words, "we the Board will do whatever the heck we feel like doing, and you petty members can go sit in a corner and color." (How's that for a polite phrasing of what I was really thinking?)

All ISC2 members need to vote against this proposal, and also sign the petition at https://jsweb.net/isc2

The biggest fool of them all of the one who just mindlessly opposes everything because they think that makes them look smart.

That's hardly indisputable, or else nobody would dispute it. On the contrary, I see a distributing tend towards authoritarianism from the American right. And so, for that matter, does everybody who knows enough history to have a right to an opinion.

Well, in real games, a the person attacking will attempt to avoid creating a stalemate since that is just a draw, and they would rather win. With this change a rule giving the attacker a win for a stalemate, there is no longer a reason to avoid that situation.

Meet the NS Savannah, genuine 1960s tech.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Because, the computer peaked in 1983!

Use zfs.

Wow. If you believe all that you must be stupid or drunk or something.