I think the AI summary has me covered on all of those TBH

If someone sends me something that's too big to paste I will have AI summarize it anyway. Because who has the time?

There's going to be more attacks across the board thanks to AI, but that's a reason to move to Linux, not stay on MS.

While some companies allowed employees more ability to work remote due to Covid, some companies had those policies before Covid as they did not have enough office space for their employees. Now those companies are mandating workers make long commutes just to fight for desks.

Except that they would know exactly who committed that change, I don't see that person getting away with it.

It hasn't paid out yet, he still needs to withdraw it to spend it. FTA: "the operator is waiting for scrutiny to fade, or has no viable way to launder a sum this visible."

This is pure speculation but what if an employee seeing all these hard drives lying around formatted them and sold them because everything is so expensive now?

I think "screener" means specifically a copy that clearly displays that it is not the release version. For example text appearing the entire movie that say "This is a screener and property of [company]". Other aspects like the movie becomes black in white randomly. Time markings appear randomly in the frame.

I think everyone here is pointing out you could read the summary past the first sentence. I would agree with you that the word "stolen" should not be in the first sentence but the rest of the summary details the situation. Netflix was given a hard drive with a movie. Netflix lost it or it is believed to have been stolen along other hard drives.

Obviously. "Guy’s got range."—Detective Peralta

Wait till he finds out about Captain Corelli's Mandolin

Remember kids, the reason we never got a Forrest Gump 2 is because the first one lost money according to Paramount. So they didn’t pay royalties to the author. The author sued and settled with Paramount for an undisclosed amount. Technically he never got royalties for Forrest Gump; Paramount paid him the money for rights to the unwritten sequel. The author then wrote Forrest Gump 2 with Forrest as the most unlikable character and put Forrest in bizarre and outlandish plot contrivances.

You asked why passengers like me would choose to fly nonstop as opposed to fly with stops. And there are many reasons why I would choose that. But according to you, I am wrong for having my own opinion.

Of course it is. You outlined all the preferences you have including using Singapore Airlines. Therefore Qantas Airlines should never create a flight you would not take. Everyone should have less choice because of your preferences.

So I should believe you over Qantas that is doing feasibility analysis. But again, Qantas should not try because you said so.

What are you talking about? That happens now. To leave Australia to London requires stops in places you may not want to stop. Also you do know that multiple airlines exist, right? If Qantas creates this flight, you can still fly your Singapore Airlines with a stop in Singapore. There are multiple airlines you will be able to choose if you want to stop. You are treating Qantas giving other people a nonstop option as them taking away your option that you would never choose. Your entire argument is everyone should make your choice.

xAI has announced that it's models have announced posession of Taylor and Travis; honeymoon sex tapes... Weeks before they even happened!

My understanding is that Australia has a duty time 11.5 hours for pilots. How does that count towards a 20 hour flight? What about the flight attendants. But that would be for a normal flight