Comment Re: Hey Facebook! Pick up your trash! (Score 1) 140
Comment Re:The other is a backup record with a QR code... (Score 2) 142
What is far more frightening is the big data correlation being done and the sharing of that data. Even in states like Washington that don't have party registration, your employer could easily determine not only if you voted but how you were likely to vote. Even on small campaigns canvassers often can see any fishing or hunting licenses you have, any magazines you subscribe to, and any other cheap or easily obtainable information that the party or campaign has purchased to categorize you as for or against.
I would suggest that everyone volunteer for a large campaign and canvass their own neighborhood in order to get access to the national party's software and see what information has been collected about you and your family.
Comment Re:Self checkout sucks. (Score 1) 406
Comment Re:Contract (Score 4, Informative) 347
There is no law protecting individuals from protesting against their company just as there is no law that says they can't be fired or subject to retaliation.
IANAL. I suspect you are not either.
According to the NLRB, you are not correct.
https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we...
Even if you're not represented by a union - even if you have zero interest in having a union - the National Labor Relations Act protects your right to band together with coworkers to improve your lives at work.
A single employee may also engage in protected concerted activity if he or she is acting on the authority of other employees, bringing group complaints to the employer's attention, trying to induce group action, or seeking to prepare for group action.
Emphasis mine.
Comment Value of money paid also faith based (Score 1) 82
Comment Re:What a crock. (Score 1) 194
It's gotta be a publicity stunt. I smell money somewhere in all this.
By that definition everything is a publicity stunt. It's a sloppy definition. I've only found one instance from 1802 that uses that definition of publicity stunt.
Comment Re:Blind studies fail (Score 3, Insightful) 588
From TFA:
Specifically, the Aerohive Network doubled the prior emissions in Fay classrooms from 2.5 GHz to 5 GHz.1 Exposure to the emissions from the highdensity Wi-Fi now used by Fay is dangerous to persons having an aggravated sensitivity to those emissions, as will be explained in more detail further below.
Comment Re:Al Franken? (Score 2) 81
Submission + - Google Stops Scanning Gmail Messages for Ads in Apps for Education (itworld.com)
Submission + - New Report Notes Over 99 Percent Of Mobile Threats Target Android (hothardware.com)
Comment Re:Most "executives" are morons (Score 1) 325
Comment Summary troll (Score 5, Informative) 313
The parasites apparently were contracted outside of the United States according to the article contrary to all of the other comments and contrary to what the Slashdot summary seems to imply.
Comment Oregon has no obscenity law,charges likely dropped (Score 4, Informative) 434
"Being naked in public in Portland is legal if it falls within the guidelines of ORS 163.465, which are included below. ORS 163.465. Public indecency
(1) A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public place the person performs:
(a) An act of sexual intercourse;
(b) An act of deviate sexual intercourse; or
(c) An act of exposing the genitals of the person with the intent of arousing the sexual desire of the person or another person."