Comment Re: You are right (Score 1) 75
You can't just pretend the malicious users don't exist. But that's exactly what Meta is doing.
Maybe we're just not ready to have certain things in our societies because there are too many shitlords.
You can't just pretend the malicious users don't exist. But that's exactly what Meta is doing.
Maybe we're just not ready to have certain things in our societies because there are too many shitlords.
That kind of thing is insane but nowhere near peak insane waste of money.
I used to do database reporting for a tribal casino. The biggest customer had dropped over $10M in there. There were more than ten others in the multi million dollar losers club.
Selling it isn't weird if it makes money...which it does, hand over fist.
*Buying* it is totally bizarre to me, but I can't deny people do.
It's not the assorted employees' faults. It's Congress' fault since it's their job to solve it.
You didn't see any of the many articles about elevated radiation detected in foods? Weird
Oh look, you CAN read. Now if only you learn to understand.
You can wipe your ass with it, which I presume is where your posts come from, but you can't build a house with it. Try letting people who know what words mean talk next time.
The glasses include six built-in microphones so users can communicate with the chatbot
So instead of helping users film people illicitly, they are going to record ambient conversations illegally.
What a surprise they're exactly the kinds of people who are into terrorism
We fund terrorism and terror attacks, sometimes deliberately, as in the case of Israel.
It is not interpreted. Learn to read.
I read TFS, and it says some of it is compiled and some of it isn't.
$99B (99369M) in cash and short term investments.
$91B total liabilities (including fake bs that's there for writeoffs)
$37B long-term debt.
When the AI bubble pops, NVDA's stock price drops but they don't have to engage in any BS tricks to pay their bills
Last I checked, $91B + $37B > $99B
True capitalism would have nicely solved these problems.
No. Capitalism truly means only that capital controls the means of production. It means literally nothing else. Anything else is regulation on top of capitalism and any regulation of capitalism is in fact a watering down of capitalism with some other strategy for management of resources. Further, systems don't solve problems, people do... or perhaps they cause them intentionally. Capitalism was designed for this.
Gotta love your bullshit cherry-picking.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
renewable actually make the balancing problem worse
False. Wind and solar are highly dispatchable, any time you have overproduction you can simply turn them off, unlike your beloved nuclear plants which are the actual problem because even the very best ones are poor at following load. The fix for nuclear's overproduction is the same as the fix for renewables' deficit, specifically more storage, but if you have more storage then you don't need nuclear at all and in fact only idiots and scum boost it because in the real world resources are finite and we'd get more for our money and effort with renewables.
Our "allies" were at war for YEARS before we got bombed which never would have happened if we had helped instead of renting those "allies" equipment. Also I live in the US so your "you're welcome" shit is doubly misplaced. Get even one half of one clue, ignoramus.
"We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company."