Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: He's right.. (Score 2) 79

The "science" coming from an institution that goes to war for oil and subsidizes the industry and bases its currency on the petrodollar is very much in doubt.

Ad Hominem

They are simply advocating more austerity by limiting what we consume while they fly off to climate junkets in the middle east in their personal 747. It's a tragicomedy of epic proportions

Hypocrisy also don't make science false.

Comment Re:Tariffs (Score 0) 42

I like the iPhone because it's a pretty good piece of hardware.

The hardware isn't the problem, it's the way the software is hobbled. Can't install arbitary software on your device, can't use the browser rendering engine of your choice on your device, don't have control over Caller ID blocking on your device if the carrier says no, can't install a decent keyboard on your device... Because Apple thinks it's their device even post-sale.

The hardware is good, inadequate battery designed to sell more batteries and/or devices aside, but everything about owning it stinks.

Comment Re:Detroit Prices (Score 4, Insightful) 37

A while ago they were selling houses for $1 so at least a mortgage should not be an issue.

The "houses" they were selling for $1 were mostly teardowns. When a house sits empty in a city with high unemployment it gets squatted in, the copper gets ripped out of the walls, it gets used for a cookhouse (as in meth, not chili) and toxic chemicals dumped on the floor and in the soil beneath, and so on. In the worst but plausible case you've got to pay tens of thousands to have it torn down, and then pay tens of thousands again to have a new structure built, after paying tens of thousands in permits. The mortgage problem is that you cannot get a mortgage on such a shithole/project, the bank simply just won't write you one.

Comment Re:You're incorrect and ignoring evolution (Score 1) 37

You're completely wrong, but phrased it in a way that results in a tautology. Yeah, the past is the past, technically speaking, but manufacturing is moving back to the developed world due to automation and it will employ a lot of people, it just requires less people per unit produced

Is 10% or less of the staff which would have once been required "a lot"?
Is less than 10% of the unemployed "a lot"?

Slashdot Top Deals

1 Mole = 25 Cagey Bees

Working...