oh your company didn't just shove Jira administration at the engineering team resulting in executives pinging them to do drop everything and add a new field or troubleshoot why their client couldn't see a ticket?
The language in the statute is "exceeding authorized access"
I don't think there needs to be any legally binding contract?
This is basically the "just because the door is unlocked doesn't mean you can help yourself to my toolshed" that they hit people who access systems with all the time.
Pretty sure they just talked to an LLM to shit out that description and didn't read the output (who wants to).
Given my experience in the industry in 2025 they probably would have been reprimanded if someone in management caught wind that they were making blog entries without an LLM writing them.
I'd like to know the total power consumption of all of their LLM queries and initiatives.
They are going to fire the human representatives
It's going to be really funny when all of these companies who fired half their staff get the pot turned up to "we need to be profitable" pricing.
Yes, it will probably still be cheaper than a human being, especially a western one. But OpenAI would be stupid not to charge 5 digits to replace a 6 digit office worker.
They added an AI button to Gmail (we use web gmail for work) and let me tell you that our email communications are not 100% written 'with AI assistance'. But the button is there 100% of time, so our CEO would happily tell investors that they are.
Christ holographic avatars and AI and SaaS. Maybe they can fit in blockchain & IoT to go for the blackout bingo
Exactly. I've been paying MLB like $130 a year to get (most) of the baseball games every year and it feels fine. It only works because the team I mostly follow is out of market where I live, so never blacked out for that reason.
It loses value slowly as they try to double dip by selling those games I've already paid for to other networks and services exclusively -- Apple TV here, Roku there, a Fox or ESPN exclusive national game. It's infurating to pay for all the games and not get all the games.
If you're a business owner and you have a task that can be done in two ways:
* Human + AI = more productive human, human level salary
* All AI = OK performance, little or no salary
You're going to choose the second one until it becomes clear that "OK performance" is actively alienating your customers.
It's also going to be funny when the people actually making the LLMs that give "OK performance" move past the user acquisition phase and put on their SaaS boots and start trying to cash in on their investments. If their LLM is worth the equivalent of Western knowledge-labor they aren't going to give unlimited queries for peanuts at some point. The calculus will get trickier for the business owner when it's tens of thousands of dollars for the "All AI" option.
"Oh what wouldn't I give to be spat at in the face..." -- a prisoner in "Life of Brian"
