They want you to think that they think they can trick you to using what's app by saying they can decrypt it when they can so that you will think they are saying they can decrypt it so you will think they can't because they are saying they can.. And yes that also makes no sense, just like your post.
All of that implies a team of builders turning up to finish what the robot started. And that kind of begs the question how much benefit was derived from hauling out a giant robot arm and tanker of foam in the first place. Building techniques such as insulated concrete formwork is already a thing and does more or less the same thing except to any shape and to a better finish.
Qualcomm's patents are for CDMA, its competitor to the GSM standard. The two operate so differently it's hard to imagine Qualcomm owns any patent in the GSM pool.
LTE is built upon the GSM standard, which appears to be free of Qualcomm's CMDA grip.
Devices on the Verizon and Sprint networks fail back to CDMA when LTE isn't available... and that means Qualcomm can demand its licensing fees.
GSM-only phones (like AT&T, T-Mobile, and most of the rest of planet Earth) don't need to worry about Qualcomm licenses.
There is a reason why Samsung phones use Samsung chips in most countries, but Qualcomm chips in North America, and that's Qualcomm's patent abuse.
The reason is that the United States is one of the very few countries that allows CDMA cell networks. Virtually every other country on the planet uses GSM exclusively. (Russia allegedly does use CDMA, but I doubt they care about Qualcomm and its American patent).
Verizon, Sprint, and a couple others using CDMA (most of which is heavily patented by Qualcomm), while AT&T & T-Mobile use GSM (which is a global FRAND standard).
So if you make a device that uses CDMA, you have to pay Qualcomm license fees; since America is one of the only places that uses CDMA for cell phones, it makes it a uniquely American problem.
If you learn computing because you want to write a game, or a website, or an application, or manage a database. i.e. if you learn for the reasons that 99.99% of people learn for then COBOL is unsuitable. Any general purpose language would be more suitable than COBOL for learning. If Java doesn't float your boat then there are the likes of C#, Python, Go, Dart, C++, Ruby etc.
It's hard to see how you think OO has "failed" given that virtually every piece of modern software uses it implicitly or explicitly.
They are sending data to me. I paid comcast to get it. COmcast can't say what data I should be able to get. They are a common carrier not a gate keeper.
But this money wouldn't go to NASA anyway.
And the money saved on this contract wouldn't necessarily go to other projects either. NASA would have one less line item in their budget and the sum they receive would be less by that amount.
Back in the real world, the police plan the operation and they are going to bring all the tools to bear that the law allows for.
Actually you can. The use of power tools doesn't eliminate the possibility of precision. Anyone that's been forcibly subjected to shop class can attest to this.
It's pretty easy to isolate different requirements for different class of operators.
Not that I buy for a minute that any part of a Trump administration gives a sh*t about "the little guy".
"Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it." -- Alex Schure