"Folks have been complaining about GNOME's UI choices for well over 20 years now."
GNOME 3, which brought the huge changes in UI as compared with GNOME 2, is about 13 years old, not twenty.
I'd say no and yes, respectively, to those questions.
It's interesting that you think "Like with a cloth" was serious when it's obvious from the context that it was a joke: https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...
Yes, Iran wants nukes, but it also wants relief from sanctions. Also, as Mattis himself pointed out, the Iran deal was written under the assumption that Iran would try to cheat and made it difficult to do so -- forcing Iran to choose between nukes and relief.
"When did this shift happen?"
Don't know if he can do the Fandango, but he sure can do the Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
"there's some question if the ladies claimed rape only after the fraud"
Wait, if it's rape by fraud, wouldn't you expect the ladies to complain only after they became aware of the fraud?
You're assuming that autistics wouldn't have hobbies outside of work. Bad assumption.
"According to Hillary's own emails
More like "according to Hotair.com's dodgy interpretation of Hilary's emails." CBS News had a different take:
But in one email exchange between Clinton and staffer Jake Sullivan from June 17, 2011, the then-secretary advised her aide on sending a set of talking points by email when he had trouble sending them through secure means.
Part of the exchange is redacted, so the context of the emails is unknown, but at one point, Sullivan tells Clinton that aides "say they've had issues sending secure fax. They're working on it."
Clinton responds, "If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."
It's unclear whether the talking points themselves contained classified information. Typically, talking points are used for unclassified purposes (e.g. speaking with the media). But in some cases, the material contained in such memos may still be sensitive -- especially if the report originates from intelligence agencies.
On Friday, the Clinton campaign's press secretary, Brian Fallon, denied that the information was classified.
On the other hand, Roberts is the guy who claimed "Ingratiation and access . . . are not corruption" in a legal opinion further enabling the legal bribery of Congress. Because, of course, there's nothing wrong with, say, a drug company ingratiating itself with those who write the laws regulating it, or an oil company ingratiating itself with those who write environmental laws.
Bear in mind that one generally isn't supposed to publically inherit from STL classes such as vector, since they don't have virtual destructors. Generally speaking, with C++, it's better to use composition to reuse functionality (e.g. making an STL vector a data member of a class) and to use inheritance to implement run-time polymorphism.
Bear in mind that there already have already been several open-source attempts at rewriting the Flash Player -- namely Gnash, Lightspark, and Mozilla's Shumway -- and all of them are still relatively immature. In short, the plan of attack that you suggest has already been tried.
The catch is whether to trust Daily Mail's supposed digging. It doesn't exactly have the most stellar reputation for accuracy.
The primary function of the design engineer is to make things difficult for the fabricator and impossible for the serviceman.
