Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Nope, not going to play Diablo 3. (Score 2) 384

Why? This means that you are less likely to get ripped off since Blizzard will be running it versus the third party sites where you are most likely getting scammed from. Why would you think the second choice is better?

Frankly because I don't care if people doing an explicitly forbidden activity get ripped off.
Wrapping it into the game likely means that all the best items will get put in the cash auction house, and the in-game-gold AH will only have lesser items.

I'd love a separate server (cluster) for those who wanted to play in the real money economy.

Comment Re:Nope, not going to play Diablo 3. (Score 4, Interesting) 384

Fuck everything about this...

I kind of have to agree...
I was a hardcore D2 gamer, almost failed out of college because of that game, and I've been looking forward to D3 Very Much.
But real money? No. I play games as an escape from thinking about things like my bank account.

Bliz, please rethink this.
Let a real money secondary economy evolve, but for the love of Pete don't enshrine it in the game.

Comment Scroogle is back to normal (Score 1) 281

Scroogle is back. Thanks to the help from three Scroogle users, I learned that there is a way to access that same simple interface with an extra parameter in the URL by using www.google.com/search (that param is &output=ie), instead of through the former static page www.google.com/ie without the extra parameter. It appears that both methods amount to the same thing.

I apologize for the title, "Scroogle has been blocked." It was in an old template, afterwhich the program went on to read a current text file. In the future it will read, "Scroogle is having problems with Google." We were IP blocked by Google more than once a couple years ago, but not all of our servers were blocked at the same time and we rerouted traffic, so no one noticed. We got those blocks lifted by Google within a few days.

-- Daniel Brandt, Scroogle programmer and sysadmin; president of nonprofit public charity Public Information Resarch, Inc., owner of Scroogle.org

Comment Re:LTO Tapes (Score 1) 411

I have to agree.
Investigated this for my last job, we did in fact end up doing SATA 1TB disks in a fireproof safe in the server room, but we had a lot less data to deal with than you do.
LTO5 should be out this year with 1.5TB native space, and it compresses very well. You could probably get one of your clients per tape.

LTO's got a long lifespan, and is readable with newer LTO tech for a few generations. There's a reason it's the industry standard backup these days.

Comment Re:Be careful using the P2V tool. (Score 5, Informative) 356

It says so in the readme file, and it's a feature not a bug to keep you from hosing your system because you didn't read the readme...

When you first fire up the new VHD it replaces the disk ID with a new one so that it's unique. This causes much trouble if the computer has two of the same disk ID at the same time when it goes to change one, as you might imagine.

Comment Re:Diesel is so obviously better for hybrids (Score 5, Informative) 687

Except that you're talking about a series hybrid drive, and only the Chevy Volt works that way at the moment.

The Insight and the Prius are both parallel drive hybrids, which means the gas engine turns the wheels as well as powers up the batteries. The electric turns the wheels sometimes. The Volt's big thing is that it's a series hybrid, the drive is always electric and the gas engine runs at its high-efficiency speed to charge the batteries, then shuts off again.

Meaning that your comment would be correct if all hybrids were series hybrids, but as of now your comment would only apply to the Volt which isn't in production yet.

Comment It started at the University of Michigan (Score 1) 3

The Justice Department should also send a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to the University of Michigan. It's a public University, but all negotiations with Google were subject to nondisclosure requirements. That's the place where Google's book-grabbing arrogance, and the acquiescence by public-sector librarians, began in 2004. It took a freedom of information request under Michigan state law to even get a copy of the contract out of the University. In it, we learned that Google indemnified the University against all legal threats that may arise from the University's agreement to hand over all their copyrighted books to Google's scanners. Google now claims that the Settlement in nonexclusive, but that's only true if you have billions in the bank and can make the sorts of guarantees that Google made to the University of Michigan. You can read about this at www.google-watch.org/modify.html

Google

Submission + - SPAM: DOJ Turns Up the Heat on Google's Book Deal 3

narramissic writes: "It appears that after its initial review of a deal that would settle a lawsuit publishers and authors filed against Google over the latter's book search engine, the DOJ is leaning toward challenging the proposed settlement. The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported late Tuesday that the DOJ is now sending civil investigative demands (CIDs) to organizations involved in the deals, a more formal approach than its initial information-gathering efforts. But Authors Guild Executive Director Paul Aiken said the fact that the DOJ is reviewing the proposed settlement isn't surprising, considering Google is involved: 'Any big deal that involves Google is going to get a look from the Justice Department.'"
Link to Original Source

Comment New BB also just announced... (Score 1) 546

Surely someone so interested in Blackberries as yourself would be aware that RIM has a new touchscreen blackberry about to be released called the Storm... http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/gsm-only-blackberry-storm-thunder-leaks-out/

Whether or not it's going to compete with the iPhone obviously has yet to be seen, but they're hardly resting on their laurels.

Democrats

Journal Journal: Democrats May Reinstate Fairness Doctrine.

Last week at the National Conference for Media Reform, Dennis Kucinich stated that Fairness Doctrine may be reinstated. The Fairness Doctrine was an FCC regulation that required broadcast media to present controversial issues in an honest, equal and balanced manner. It was repealed in 1987, and the Supreme Court ruled that the Doctrine was constitutional when applied to radio stat

Slashdot Top Deals

!07/11 PDP a ni deppart m'I !pleH

Working...