Comment Re: I thought Apple (Score 1) 31
Just tried this and I'm not getting ads when asking for directions. Maybe I'm lucky?
Just tried this and I'm not getting ads when asking for directions. Maybe I'm lucky?
I think you are right I just subconsciously ignore those. What I usually do with maps is click on the little indicators in the maps, this seems to show the one I clicked on without any "sponsored". So far that (and directly searching for a place by name) has not introduced a "sponsored" result. Hopefully Apple is doing the same.
Circumpolar launches of starlink are done from Vandenberg. It also has a big ocean south of it.
Holy crap you are showing the desperation of somebody who is losing their argument.
Yes the DSA talks about ranked choice voting and increasing the size of the house and the Supreme Court and reducing the senate's power and so on. But these are all so moderates and proportional representation have a chance. It is not "marxist" in any way whatsoever, in fact it is the opposite.
I do fear the DSA, if the win, and feel they will still be preferred over extreme-right candidates, will suddenly have amnesia and forget all these promises (since they still help moderates, who would win over the extreme left just like they would win over the extreme right). But you are a fool to say these ideas are "marxist".
Google Maps is *not* putting ads into search results so at least for now Apple is doing worse.
Yeah.
They completely ignore panserpmia.
They just quote Isaac Asimov's writing from almost half a century ago (Europa). Ignores Enceladus, Titan, Venus, Mars; all of which have *BIOSIGNATURES* of a probability curve not too dissimilar to Europa.
They are likely a dilettante. Those folks do not do "prior art" research because they believe in the Auteur Myth.
"An auteur is a filmmaker whose personal style and thematic focus are so distinctive that they are considered the 'author' of their films, a concept known as the auteur myth."
Real science isn't that. Real science is a rational discipline. The null hypothesis -- know what that means. Prior art -- know what that means. Mental biases -- know those, too; you'll see what you want to see, hear what you want to hear. Science is the discipline of mind that ensures you're not just spewing random nonsense. You verify what you think; that's the discipline.
As Isaac Newton said ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), "nani gigantum humeris insidentes."
Ignore them.
Everything seems obvious once it is explained.
Why do 12-14 steps of algebra, when calculus works in 2?
Obvious. People should know calculus.
Yet they don't.
Define Green's Theorem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... -- is obvious.
Everything is obvious *IN HINDSIGHT*.
Domestic panels will get more expensive, too, as they are made from polysilicon.
Yes all the time. Using a Tablo DVR
Why isn't there a second independent AI that examines the main AI's output, and decides if it should be censored or not. If it thinks so, the answer is not delivered.
Since the second one is only looking at the first AI's output it seems like it would be difficult or impossible to fool it, especially if it's window is very short (like only the current message).
I assume there is some reason this does not work. Any explanations?
I will not write it, Sam-I-Am,
I will not offer colored ham!
Those are visible harassment campaigns (and visible on purpose to scare others). He was wondering about ones people don't know about, secret and/or unreported harassment campaigns.
I think they feel it would be more like humans communicate. But humans invented blackboards and certainly found them useful to improve communication.
Facebook is not in chronological order.
People do not tell the truth about their motives when answering polls. News at 11.
The value of a program is proportional to the weight of its output.