Comment Re:No different than any other sequestering (Score 1) 288
Newzbin.com Usenet Indexing Trial Set To Begin Next Week 76
Avatar — the Metacontextual Edition 15
Comment Re:Disclosures: Dr DeKosky Gets Big Pharma Money (Score 1) 403
StarCraft AI Competition Announced 200
Comment Re:Why? (Score 3, Insightful) 137
StarCraft II Single-Player Details Revealed 206
StarCraft II Delayed Until 2010 453
Comment Re:Eh...not likely for quite some time (Score 1) 210
Odds are downright terrible for "intelligent nanobots", we might have hardware that can do what a cell can do, that is, hunt for (possibly a series of) chemical cues and latch on to them, then deliver the payload -- perhaps repeatedly in the case of disease-fighting designs -- but putting intelligence into something on the nanoscale is a challenge of an entirely different sort that we have not even begun to move down the road on; if this is to be accomplished, the intelligence won't be "in" the nano bot, it'll be a telepresence for an external unit (and we're nowhere down *that* road, either -- nanoscale sensors and transceivers are the target, we're more at the level of Look, Martha, a GEAR! A Pseudo-Flagellum!)
Your individual neurons aren't particularly intelligent either. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_automata