Soon we won't be allowed to slander the poor AI models online. Anyone who says AI is anything short of benign and useful gets their internet license revoked. Jokers saying Hello and Thank you may have been onto something.

Because I'm sure this can't be the first time I see this headline.

Sometimes an option, but for really random stuff it's hard to find anyone that would sell it. I need to replace the soft pads inside my bicycle helmet right now. You'd hope one of the five bicycle shops I could find would have them, right? And today I was looking into a dell ultra sharp monitor. 850+ on dell website. I have 10% employee discount, ok. But Scan sell for 735 and Amazon for 660. It's hard to say no to. I've seen plenty of examples where Amazon is far from cheapest, but manufacturer is somehow rarely the cheaper option.

I've had that experience. My assumption is it's a long con to build up account rep and reviews for a rug pull later. Or they're pocketing the shipping cost from their Amazon prime subscription ..

This is an attempt and defense. Your AI agents go to people's houses, walk over the Not Welcome mats, help themselves to whatever they find in the fridge and complain about some owners trying to fight them off with a water spray bottle.

Nah, this thread is onto something. I've seen policies to scrub old employee info from all systems within X amount of years after they leave.

Are not exactly private, as your HR will make it very clear. But I do hope someone spends the time to adequately review all those chats and emails to make sure no private client information leaks out... Right?

Nothing a few more AI data centers won't fix. But you're right, we've royally screwed ourselves and future generations.

Five sets of 256, easy to read, no learning curve. Set the problem aside until we do need a trillion unique IPs.

Wow, you're right. I always assumed it was median. Must be something to do with those nice symmetrical bell curves they use everywhere to explain it. Can't easily find a modern distribution table, but the 1916 one demonstrates that an IQ of 100 is below average. Interesting.

Or is it 49%? If 100 is adjusted to be average across a target population, there's going to be a lot of people right on the mark... And it's not linear distribution, so there's more people scored 100 than there are 148 or 71... I should ask ChatGPT... ChatGPT said that 50% are above 100, 50% are below 100. Yeah, we're screwed.

We still know microplastics are bad because deliberately introducing them to lab animals produces all sorts of bad stuff. Our samples might be skewed towards showing more of them in more places than there actually are, so perhaps things are not quite as bad yet. On the other hand, the same bias could mean that micro plastics becomes a problem at smaller quantities than previously thought.

What you need to fight this is multiple sets of credentials that unlock multiple accounts and folders. Use one pin to unlock a clean account with clean social media profiles. Another set to get in provate comms and files. Yet another to open the clean one while deleting personal in the background. It might not work against a professional forensics team, but it'll make any attempts to force people to incriminate themselves expensive. And before you ask, totalitarian government control is spreading and I worry about it more than "think of the children".

I think your analysis is starting from a solid point, but i still worry there is a lot of room for things to go wrong. LLM oriented code might not have a 1:1 human readable equivalent. There are likely to be subtle differences and assumptions lost in translation. LLM code might also evolve faster, turning it into an arms race to keep up.

You're right, UK has some of the most expensive electricity around, at an average price of 25c per kWh. And that is subsidised by a standing charge of 65c a day per household, meaning it disproportionally affects those who try to be economical.