Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Too late for homo sapiens? (Score 1) 86

Feeding the troll didn't lead anywhere, did it? Notwithstanding your potentially ponderous handle.

Not that I have any constructive solution approaches at this point. I think the die has been cast. The pressure to spend more money is coming from inside the (White) House. For some years we had some sensible international negotiations to reduce military spending along the lines of "I'll reduce mine if you reduce yours." I can't detect any of that going on now, but rather the pressure is pretty much on every government to increase military spending as fast as possible to avoid attacks and invasions. But the other sides just respond by spending more money on more weapons. Ad infinitum? Not. Ad human extinction only.

Can you imagine a grand negotiation among the biggest military powers to mutually reduce their military budgets with mutual transparency and inspections all around? Me neither.

Comment "just use a TV" commenters - have you seen one? (Score 1) 52

'The Frame' is different to a standard TV because it's matt. That's the thing - it truly is designed more for static image than for moving glitz and glamour. I like them, and if it weren't for my distrust of online Samsung these days I'd likely have got one. I fully understand those who have done - it's a nice device that's good at its task.

Comment Re:Is the problem not obvious? (Score 1) 152

The context remains the same; greed is greed the world over. And greed, left unchecked, can never, ever, be satisfied with what it has; it only wants more.

But you're fooling yourself if you think that corruption is limited to countries without rule of law. For example, the Philippines has a constitution; it has rule of law; but it is a very corrupt country. And you're truly fooling yourself if you think corruption doesn't exist in the United States; they just have a different way of facilitating it. For example, politicians get bought out every day by corporations that "donate" to political action committees in exchange for the passage of legislation favorable to their business operations. And this current administration isn't making any attempt to hide the corruption; before our very eyes, Venezuela's president was kidnapped and replaced with a leader more favorable to providing the United States with exclusive oil contracts. Trump himself said that he didn't notify Congress about the operation, but he did notify oil companies. And you know they didn't get that information for free.

In the US, we do exploit child labor. We've just outsourced it to other countries, to give corporations plausible deniability that they have no knowledge of the exploitation, despite how well known it is. If you're buying anything with a Lithium Ion battery, then you, in America, are paying for cobalt mined by children in the Congo. If you're buying any chocolate, then you, in America, are paying for chocolate harvested in the coastal West Africa region picked by children. And if you really want to enlighten yourself, feel free to look through the entire list our government has on goods we buy produced by child labor here.

And I'm trying very hard to tell you, many people don't have the choice you think they do. You naively believe that everyone working fast food is a teenager finding a starting job? Have you even been to a McDonalds in the last ten years? Many, many fast food workers are working double-shifts or multiple jobs just to make ends meet. But don't just take my word for it. Take your pick of good reporting that has documented the struggles of real people who are stuck, and listen to their reasons as to why it hasn't worked for them to escape where they're stuck.

I'm glad we have something to agree about with the Farm Bill. But don't just throw the baby out with the bath water on it. A lot of it is necessary to provide food stability for the country. But there is a lot of pork and waste that has become baked into the bill, and a lot of both rural and corporate America that is now trapped in dependency on its government welfare. Which means that, if you do throw the baby out with the bath water, it would so greatly disrupt food production in this country, it would lead to drastic food shortages and upheaval.

Comment Separating out the chaff? (Score 1) 26

My experiences with Reddit and Discord are similarly useless. I do believe there is some good stuff on both websites, but the volume of chaff is overwhelming and the search functions are deficient. Sometimes better luck from an outside search, but still disappointing more often than not.

I used to be interested in why, but mostly lost interest. Speculations that Reddit has been forced into some sort of defensive crouch and presumptive filtering by spammers, while Discord is just living up to its branding. Or perhaps Discord is too game-centric and my gaming days are mostly too far behind me?

Comment Re:Is USB C sufficiently reliable for power? (Score 1) 89

Very constructive response and cable suspicions have been haunting me, though buying test equipment (beyond the cheap multi-meter I already own) seems too expensive an approach. But it makes me wonder about a service that might be offered in shops that have the battery pack sales or rental. Maybe next to that they could have a little device were you pay a buck to have it test your USB C cable? Maybe gamify it by letting you test as many cables as you can plug in and out in a minute? I have several "suspicious" ones around here.

Comment Re:Is USB C sufficiently reliable for power? (Score 1) 89

Interesting and somewhat relevant. But one of my AC adapters is quite large. I'd have to dig around for the specs, but I think it was 2 amps. I haven't tried it with all of the devices involved, but I don't ever recall seeing any "slow charging" problems before I switched it to the USB C cables. (Actually that is a statement I think I could make broadly about lots of AC adapters and with various USB connections including micro and mini. I think I'm down to my last mini device and only one or two micros. However I also think it's possible the older devices would conceal "slow charging" even if that's the current status of the DC input.)

Comment Re:Is USB C sufficiently reliable for power? (Score 1) 89

Actually I studied some electrical engineering a long time ago so I know that AC is not DC, but if the AC adapter is unhappy with the power it is receiving, then the output DC may be affected. Especially in the case of less expensive AC adapters, of which I have too many. Also too many cables of various lengths.

You're also wrong about the device. Quite a new smart phone. However it is possible that my usage pattern has "troubled" it.

Perhaps you could ask more politely to see if any of the details are relevant to what you actually know?

Comment Why not at least attempt to solve the problem? (Score 0) 17

Wow. An AC that actually had a valid point? Will miracles never cease? But why was AC too afraid to put a handle on it? Maybe it's also a legitimate use of anonymity? Could it be that FP is from a Microsoft insider who has had access to the actual numbers of who profits from spam?

However I think it's not likely that the scamming spammers voluntarily share much loot with their accomplices in high places. Microsoft's profits would be derivative from "volume" that helps sell more ads. I sure would like to compare the relevant figures for YouTube and LinkedIn, but that would require me to be a triple insider (instead of one of the ultimate outsiders). ["It's intuitively obvious to the most casual observer" is really about Buddhist-style detachment leading to clarity?]

But I retain my delusions about solutions. I think the money could be chased and reduced. Even easier with modern AI. Think of the numbers this way: LOTS of spam reaching LOTS of people who hate spam, but only a TINY number of suckers who are actually conned into sending money. If 10% of the spam haters wanted to help interfere with the money, then they would vastly overwhelm the limited supply of suckers. Actually I think the return numbers for spam are tiny fractions of 1%, so that means 1% of spam haters actively involved in the fight against spam would already greatly outnumber the suckers.

But how to make it convenient to be active against spam? I keep fantasizing about a spam-analysis website. Basically an iterative analysis where you paste in some spam (or even a link to spam) and then you help the website (with it's own AI) to analyze the scam and target the best countermeasures. Humans need to be in the loop, and that's actually the scamming spammers' Achilles heel. They can't obfuscate too much or the human suckers can't figure how and where to send the money. (Of course such a website must always be open to "Other" responses as the spammers try new scams and as the targeting stats change.)

And yet the problems just become more pervasive. Today's interesting example is a Japanese book about banking. From my "convenient to read" stack, it's actually a manga targeting Japanese children, but I was distinctly surprised when Chapter 5 introduced the kids to fraudsters and identity theft. The magic piggy bank that has been helping the protagonist learn about banking is suddenly replaced with a criminal piggy bank who tries to steal the child's new year's money (in its fancy decorative envelope). Initially it tries to talk the child into a bad investment in a fake company, but then the good piggy bank shows up, tears off the bad piggy bank's disguise, and it becomes a physical battle for the envelope. (I'm right in the middle now, so I can't tell you how it comes out, but the bad guy seemed to be winning in the last frame I saw...)

Comment Re:definitions (Score 3, Insightful) 133

He can say so all he wants, but at the moment Venezuela is under control of the existing government, under the vice president. There are no US troops in the country. What we have seen in Venezuela is, for lack of a better word, a special military operation, with the intent to extract Maduro, not to occupy or subjugate the country by military force.

Comment Re:They still aren't profitable... (Score 2) 26

Discord is fine when it's just video and chat. The problem is that gaming communities, modders and (worse) companies have started to use Discord for things that it isn't: a discussion forum, a help desk system, a knowledge management platform. It is ridiculously bad at all of those, mainly because content is invisible unless you join that particular Discord community, and the content is not indexed by Google. Inside Discord, there is no search across communities either, and the limited search function they have is terrible.

More and more, I see information and discussions disappear off websites and forums, and end up on Discord, never to be found again.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -- Publius Syrus

Working...