Comment Mozilla decided, and we get to live with it (Score 1) 589
There's two issues, performance and the user interface.
As far as the UI is concerned, what it looks like is Mozilla has opted to support people with a very linear lifestyle. They want a few pages, they want to look at them one at a time, and they want them available everywhere. If the world had started out on cell-phones, all browsers might look like this. To my mind, this is a step backwards. It’s like the browsers of the 90’s, only with synch. If you look at the links on a new tab, in a revived speed dial (only one tab, not multiple), on the library menu, all of them are pushing pages you looked at recently. It's no longer easy to open multiple tabs, which lowers my productivity -- at least until I get some new workarounds.
As far as performance is concerned, it's a mixed bag. Yes, single pages load faster. Yes, the memory footprint is lower (but I haven't stressed it yet). However, I used to be able to open 20+ tabs at one time, and when I try that now, FF hangs. I get all the pages, but they are blank. So I'm working my way through the process....3 pages?....5 pages?.... The thing is, raw performance was never an issue with me (not that they asked). I'll have pages open for 15-20 minutes, and if they take an extra minute to load, that's OK
My biggest gripe is, they didn't ask. They decided, and forced their decision on me. Am I going to ragequit? Not....yet.