Comment Re:Depends on the topic (Score 1) 72
For shits and giggles, I tested it against x86-64/linux (as) and it did fine. Can't remember which I used... probably one of the Qwens.
Now granted, it wasn't super complicated, it just basically called stat(2) and write(2) to display the output... but I mean, it did do it, no libraries.
Agreed, when I say chasing its tail I'm not talking about a simply output to the command line (which I really wasn't clear on). I created a program that generates a maze using Kruskal's algorithm with C++ and asked Claude to convert this to intel assembly with comments to cover where the equivalent functions and variables would be to make it easier for a class to match the assembly with the C++. It mostly worked, but Claude kept chasing one bug in circles until I realized what it was doing wrong and pointed out where the actual problem was. The LLM is quite good, but it has a tendency to get stuck and need help getting back out more than I like.