What existing stuff is not fucked up? We need a software architecture that puts security first, whether that's microkernel-based or whatever else. And we need to rethink the way we handle speculative execution as well. We need substantive changes, not further rearrangement of deck chairs and a declaration of victory.
Shareholders want anything but to be held accountable for how they invest their money.
But they are the enablers of evil deeds. Fuck them.
Why does everyone always leap straight to killing people, for which there are wholly separate versions of the laws based on differing circumstances, to try to describe situations where that is not the case?
Why does everyone who does this ignore that manslaughter is still a crime, so they are really proving the opposite of what they think they are proving?
That is not what is happening. What is happening is that someone has a new paper about whether it's true or not. It will probably change few minds.
Pump and dump. Sold all his stock in that venture to support his other ventures.
Yeah but they can't fix the robots.
And if the robots are using LLMs they might hallucinate a need to kill them. They could behave completely normally for a thousand days and then go batshit on day 1001
It could, but there would not only be no benefit to that, there would be an anti-benefit. The data could potentially be tampered with in flight. The whole point of cryptographic attestation on the camera is that it proves the data came from the device.
Yes, there is a need. We need to make it unprofitable. It's not enough to hold peons or even executives accountable, we must hold SHAREHOLDERS accountable and the only way to do that is by COSTING THEM MONEY.
A criminal act requires an intent to commit a act which is criminal (it doesn't require knowing that the act is criminal, just that the act is done intentionally
So they accidentally pushed the button?
The right wing absolutely acknowledges history. The Democratic Party's defense of slavery and it expansion into new territory.
Every time I run into a southern strategy denialist I know I am about to see a bunch of bullshit. You should have put that at the end of your rant, then someone might have believed part of it. What a fucking amateur.
Babylon 5 gets proper dirty with way more candid and realistic depictions of subtle ways fascism poisons even well meaning groups and structures
Enterprise tried to explore that and people didn't like it. So, back to form.
There's two events that stick out in my mind that demonstrate to me how opinions are changing on nuclear fission for energy. The first event was seeing Andrew Yang advocated for nuclear power in his campaign for POTUS.
lololololol
Statistically nobody gives even one single solitary fuck about anything Andrew Yang ever said, let alone while "running for president" which was not really a thing that happened since he had less than zero chance to win. He was running for attention so someone might know who he was.
Those that do try to get away with anything regarding nuclear safety quickly get run out on a rail.
Literally the entire industry is about getting away with a bad decision regarding safety.
..why a company with a 4 trillion dollar market capitalization and a quarter of a trillion dollars in cash needs to borrow lass than two billion dollars from the government?
Because it's almost always better to spend someone else's money than your own.
It's also apparently better to answer your own question instead of the one that was asked. No one was confused about why they would rather get an interest free loan. They were obviously alluding to the fact that this is bullshit nonsense from the feds designed to kill renewables.
Apple has done it with OSX.
What? Apple did it with OSX, which is based on NeXTStep, which is based on Mach and FreeBSD? They absolutely did not do it with OSX. They dusted off NeXTStep, fucked up the interface, and made the necessary technical improvements to its ancient legacy codebase to make it function in the modern world... no better than any other legacy OS.
It is not well to be thought of as one who meekly submits to insolence and intimidation.
