He can't do everything Vlad wants any more, which could be a problem for him

All events except for telling the truth about the president in public you mean

I read it, I still had the question, neither comment explains why you felt it was necessary

I'm not worried about the cells. I'm worried about the assemblies.

We'll see. I've had lots of electronics fail in short order without having to work as hard as automotive parts, and I've also seen plenty of automotive electronics fail.

Why are you invoking that pedo shit?

"Anyone considered the annoying-as-fuck TROLL problem yet?"

B!zX saw it and decided to make sure to keep them here with the AC checkbox.

If you think humanities aren't education then you certainly haven't had enough humanities.

I've had MANY processes not die with a kill -9 across many different Unixes and unixlikes, over the years.

This is some kind of semi advanced troll right? I'm on mobile so I can't read the comment below yours, sorry

You told us you were triggered when you said you couldn't even follow the ad because it had too many brown people in it. You just don't know what these words mean because it's part of your personality to be ignorant.

Y'all are arguing over an unknowable but I find the root assertion credible, and here's why.

Linus had a choice of licenses to start with. He chose GPLv2 over BSD or MIT because he thought that the freedom aspect was desirable for such a project.

But by the time GPLv3 rolled around, Linus was no longer a student hobbyist. He was a professional, deriving a living from Linux, which was growing. He could see that his profits would likely be greater if he did not choose the freest license. At first he didn't care about appealing to corporations, then he did.

What changed? His compensation.

So yeah, the root assertion is 100% correct. Linus chose profit over freedom. That was his choice to make, and it's not surprising, but it's factual.

What social contract? You can't meaningfully have one when you allow anonymous cowards.

Lolol @ "rage".

If you were ever not disingenuous, THAT would be news.

All the parts are made there. They're probably using a licensed core, though. All of their performant CPUs are based around them.

What would be hard is making a PC with all American components.

It's also easier to verify because the training corpus is known. You can't verify a human's training data set.