Granted it's in a different discipline, but the instructor having to use AI to write backs up the claim that people are forgetting things by using AI. It's a bit ironic for other reasons, but still supports the point.
Honestly, if you want to live in the mountains in bum fuck no where, you can't expect society to provide you a fiber connection. We don't even provide those people with sewer connections for precisely the same reason.
Well, no. The two things are very different. Data leaves down the same "pipe" it came through, while sewage systems and water supply systems are both separate (you hope) and VERY DIFFERENT. They have almost completely different considerations in every department. Also, if you live in the sticks, there's no real drawback to not having a sewer connection.
That is stupid.
lolololol
We don't know "exactly" how the brain works, but we do know that they learning and strengthening of skills is the result of training neurons.
Double down forever, dumbass.
In fact it's just a lot of bullshit. Embedded refers to how a product is used, and there are plenty of non-embedded ARM computers.
What do you mean by embedded/non-embedded? Apple uses SoC and SiPs, they are as "embedded" as anything else being used in a PC. Embedded systems are systems hidden within something else. PCs are the opposite of that.
I regret not getting more GPU. I have a 4060 Ti 16GB, as the minimum card with decent VRAM. I did buy some 8TB HDDs too, but I only got 3 of 'em.
99.44% chance that this is about sending more tax money to ol' musky.
At present, it is impossible to predict long-term technological developments and the evolution of consumer preferences.
Yes, they might prefer slower internet!
This guy has passed right by needing to determine whether people would like fire which can be fitted nasally and on to deserving to have it fitted rectally.
(remember the "90% of the brain is not used" pre-fMRI myth?)
Yes, but only in the same way as I remember there was a global cooling scare supported by a tiny minority of scientists but in fact perpetrated by media — which has always been sensationalist. The actual scientific statement was that most of the brain is not active at any given time. We found out that more of it is doing something more of the time, but some areas remain way more active than others so there's still a kernel of truth to that idea — the same as it ever was.
Don't encourage him. The peak of his thinking is that we're more responsible than China so unfettered capitalism is great actually.
I did the same, although I "only" got 64GB. I have a 5900X. I bought the MiniPC in part because they are both Zen3, that's handy since I run Devuan on both so if I build a package specifically for this architecture I can use it in both places.
Anyone who suggests using a MiniPCB instead of a small SBC shouldn't be touching SBCs.
Anyone who suggests they know better than someone else what they wanted the computer for should spend less time touching themself publicly.
Some of us don't want to hear a lot of bullshit.
Suggesting for example that I should have to constantly hear from the religious about what they think their magic sky daddy wants from me today is frankly absolute shit. Those people do not deserve attention. They should be ignored. No one should have to accept their harassment.
The idea that I should want to be subjected to that kind of emotional abuse is childish at best and comes from a needy place of having to have everyone be forced to listen to YOU.
Sure, we reasonably know training AI is fair use, although that could get modified in the future. But I'm not talking about training an AI model, I'm talking about the output from the model.
Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.
