Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Not necessarily a bad thing (Score 1) 177

Some of us don't want to hear a lot of bullshit.

Suggesting for example that I should have to constantly hear from the religious about what they think their magic sky daddy wants from me today is frankly absolute shit. Those people do not deserve attention. They should be ignored. No one should have to accept their harassment.

The idea that I should want to be subjected to that kind of emotional abuse is childish at best and comes from a needy place of having to have everyone be forced to listen to YOU.

Comment Re:Closed-source software outlets called Open-yada (Score 1) 14

"Open" (without the word "source") originally typically meant "interoperable", which for software frequently meant as little as "documented and with headers". Before most people had ever heard of "open source" there were all kinds of other open things, most commonly standards. If your platform is open to the public, that's a legitimate kind of openness that's also familiar.

Comment Re:Oh no! (Score 3, Informative) 49

I bought a MiniPC from China instead, a GMKtec M5 Plus with 5825U, 32GB DDR4 and a 1TB NVMe SSD — for $295 right before everything went to shit. That one is out of production, but an equivalent machine is now $600. I've had it for over a year now with literally no problems.

The memory is 3.2 GHz, and despite being so cheap it doesn't even report a manufacturer, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it. It's got wifi 6 (MT7922) and dual 2.5 GbE (RTL8125) and the only thing that requires even a vaguely recent kernel is the wifi. It came with Windows, and I even shrank that just in case I'm ever desperate for a real Windows machine to flash some firmware or something, but ofc I've never needed or wanted to.

Too bad the combination of AI bullshit and tariff fuckery has doubled the price, I'd buy another similar machine.

Comment Re: Standing on the shoulders of giants (Score 1) 80

we do know pretty well how "copying" and "reproducing" works and it's definitely not that.

Unfortunately we don't really. The standard for what is a derivative work is substantial recognizable elements. It doesn't specify exactly how you get there.

otoh the process of creating these models has been universally called "training" and "learning" for a while, and that's because there is a obvious conceptual similarity with these human processes, even though we do not know exactly how neurons go about it

I'm not trying to convince anyone to change their terminology, but the aptness of the term is all on the conceptual side.

Slashdot Top Deals

The opossum is a very sophisticated animal. It doesn't even get up until 5 or 6 PM.

Working...