"approximately match" does not mean "no better than", but thanks for proving you don't understand any of these words. It means to have similar results to.

But I have it on good authority from many authority figures that police are responsible adults who keep us safe!

This is why Qualified Immunity should not exist, full stop

Tesla turns off FSD right before collisions to fuck with the stats. If you believe their stats you're a stupid tool.

Cuck.

If we do that, their faces won't have a look of hate on them at the time.

Cuck.

As I said, it's not a VPN, and pretending it is doesn't make it one.

Easy, they deny that's the actually state of things, claim everyone is lying about everything, etc.

He wants to force medicate the homeless, he's not a good guy. I guess anonymous coward bots don't have to know anything before posting though.

Yeah, I don't think they're intentionally admitting that they are okay with child rape, and I don't think most of them even know it, but I bet a bunch of them say it out loud in private.

No it isn't. That's literally not what "you find that weak sensing just leads to a safety curve that flattens out way too early" means.

It doesn't get tired. It might get into an altered state. It can definitely get distracted, and get confused about what something even is so long that it's a problem. It doesn't have infinite resources.

Using other types of sensors takes guesswork out of certain decisions. If you can measure density and depth like you can with a mix of sensors which don't even include cameras then you can reliably do AEB which overrides your beloved optical-only system and keeps it from screwing the pooch.

This is true, indeed as you allude there is much that a brain does that you don't want your software to do. But you may not be able to separate all of those things away from the things you do want without going badly awry, either. Also, some of those things may be artifacts of the attached peripherals.

All of those words have meanings and make sense as he used them. Your lack of comprehension isn't his fault.

What's crazy is imagining that a computer can definitely do what a brain does when we don't even know how the brain does it. MAYBE it can, but we have no proof of that.

You and the other cowards? Who the fuck are you? Nobody.

It isn't something everyone agrees on since so many want to protect Trump from being prosecuted for it. Literally every single Republican voter has signaled that they think it is acceptable to rape children.

It's not a VPN, are you still happy?