Comment Re: Terrorist Targets? (Score 1) 114
They're people who cause those kinds of things to happen to others. Boo. Fucking. Hoo.
Comment Re: Being too wealthy really is sociopathic (Score 1) 114
The wealthy have always been like that. We just notice more now because of the media and Internet.
Comment Re: Justified true hope (Score 1) 104
It would be weird on a site without so many reich wing maggot cucks.
Comment Re: CostCo crap for a few pennies (Score 1) 104
If you think that's all PFAS is for them you don't know anything. Try Google.
Comment Re: Being too wealthy really is sociopathic (Score 1) 114
A bus comes by here and I live in the sticks.
Now if it only came more often than every two hours, or took less than 45 minutes to do what takes 20 by car...
Comment Re: Remove Encryption? (Score 0) 58
Can't be maintained? Lol
Comment Wait until you find out about celebrity addiction (Score 4, Interesting) 45
Your brain can only handle so many relationships and after that you start forgetting people.
If you fill those slots by learning a bunch of shit about people you'll never meet or know then they're just wasted.
Interpersonal relationships started going downhill when celebrity became, ironically, common.
Comment Re:HFS+ is ancient (Score -1, Flamebait) 58
HFS+ was introduced with MacOS 8.1 in the late 90s. It doesn't even support dates past the year 2040. It makes sense for them to start phasing it out.
They aren't doing that.
Apple adds that "macOS 28 and later will continue to support unencrypted volumes that use Mac OS Extended format," and notes "Mac OS Extended is also known as HFS Plus (or HFS+)."
You wrote two comments in this discussion, and they are both utter bullshit.
Comment Re:Remove Encryption? (Score 1, Informative) 58
They're not removing encryption support
Except they are. That is the one and only thing they are doing. They just aren't removing it from filesystems you care about, and you don't care about other people.
They're only dropping it from their deprecated 1990s-era filesystem.
And yet they are not dropping support for that filesystem without encryption, which is why Apple is literally doing what you said they are not doing. Not only can't you handle more than one button, you also can't handle more than one idea.
Comment Re: Digital Markets Act (Score 1) 64
No, SOME users want that unrestricted free-for-all.
Moving the goalposts. Get a real argument.
Comment Re:Toxic? (Score 2) 104
This is the fantasy of a child.
And a coward, to boot. Fixing things is hard, burning everything down is easy, but then comes the regret
Comment Re:Deadly Premonition? (Score 1) 47
Sadly, the cheats and the pirates are going to force Irdeto's hand and end up disabling games that were previously playable in Proton.
False. Their changes won't prevent Denuvo from being broken again, so there is no hand-forcing, just a lot of them using that hand to jack off.
Comment Re:Toxic? (Score 1) 104
If we want things to improve we have to make a responsible choice sometimes and not choose our base desires to blow everything up and then throw our hands up and question why we're surrounded by ashes.
We don't, though. Some of us do, but many want things to not just stay the same but go backwards, to a time when they personally were doing better... or thought they were.
Comment Re:Well it isn't (Score 1) 181
Companies do not depend on nitpicking with peer reviewers. They could just do their thing, or they publish some insights.
Companies make press releases. Sometimes they are disguised as papers. "Do their thing" means "do stuff which makes money", that's the only reason they exist.
Comment Re:So, we need a gaming monopoly to help Wine? (Score 1) 47
Proton doesn't commit back to Wine, Codweavers adopt commits from Proton
Codeweavers helps develop Proton.
Have a think about how forks work before you call someone else's comments bullshit.
Have a think about how Proton is developed before you talk more bullshit.
