Comment Re: There it is (Score 1) 33
"I have always seen the GPL as a license requiring any changes to published code be documented and not much else"
Try reading it.
"I have always seen the GPL as a license requiring any changes to published code be documented and not much else"
Try reading it.
"You do understand that the freedom and licenses you're defending, specifically allow others to use your work for purposes you don't agree with, right?"
No they fucking do not. The licenses disallow placing additional restrictions on redistribution. Just because IBM is violating this now doesn't make it not a violation
And they will surely be successful because they already have a proven market of people who think that Facebook does targeted advertising, when its idea of targeting is to aim at anyone who's ever interacted with any content autotagged with any of the advertiser's chosen keywords, even if they laughed and blocked. As such they will probably fall for the idea that the chatbots will work, as well.
How quickly we forget Google Gears.
My ten seconds of research on the topic turned up this:
You didn't look at CCDs
All of this is a guess, of course, to the point where I'm not even going to sign my name to this post
Look at CCDs and you can sign the next one
So, you're saying that the point of cars and trains was to profit off of the destruction of the horse industry? That doesn't make much sense.
What you said there makes no sense at all in light of what I said in response to what you said. You really need to work on learning English.
It's so cute that you think that makes your case for you. Is this just another thing you claim to be doing but aren't, like when you said you were a plant science expert but couldn't manage to figure out that mature forests sequester more CO2?
They need to block the AI slop entirely and ban the frauds posting it.
They're not even going to be able to detect it reliably, nor avoid false positives. It's also not all fraud. Also as sibling points out, ALL content is profitable for them, AI or not.
If you've got the AI tools to tell you how you screwed up with C, why do you need Rust? Just fix what the LLM says you broke. Now you have the speed of C without the bugs. It ought to be easy to find that class of error, right?
It's a misunderstanding at best, though. The work doesn't have to happen for the CEOs to get richer. They count their ends while walking away from a burning dumpster. They don't know how the work gets done because they don't need to know, it's not relevant to their enrichment.
I would reserve "AI Psychosis" to people whose behavior resembles something like schizophrenia.
So like Peter Theil being happy to usher in our replacement? He's willfully attempting to destroy literally all of humanity...
Street Preacher ain't got nothing on Wall Street.
"All the time? Low overhang speeds + fan with overhang. Not tricky."
If you have printed parts with horizontal holes which were not relieved on top, and you printed them in PETG, then you either had sag, or poor layer adhesion due to insufficient temperature. That's a huge percentage of why people still print in PLA. (Another big part is that it's so much cheaper than PHA.)
Also, things can have been getting better overall but it can also be unsustainable.
Now do Paul...
Sure, peter, paul, almond joy, whatever.
But yeah, Saul of Tarsus definitely picked up Christianity and ran off with it, he completely changed its nature. And modern "Christians" often celebrate his attack on their faith. Sad, but then, what about religion isn't sad?
"Though a program be but three lines long, someday it will have to be maintained." -- The Tao of Programming