Comment Re: Remove Encryption? (Score 0) 26
Can't be maintained? Lol
Can't be maintained? Lol
Your brain can only handle so many relationships and after that you start forgetting people.
If you fill those slots by learning a bunch of shit about people you'll never meet or know then they're just wasted.
Interpersonal relationships started going downhill when celebrity became, ironically, common.
HFS+ was introduced with MacOS 8.1 in the late 90s. It doesn't even support dates past the year 2040. It makes sense for them to start phasing it out.
They aren't doing that.
Apple adds that "macOS 28 and later will continue to support unencrypted volumes that use Mac OS Extended format," and notes "Mac OS Extended is also known as HFS Plus (or HFS+)."
You wrote two comments in this discussion, and they are both utter bullshit.
They're not removing encryption support
Except they are. That is the one and only thing they are doing. They just aren't removing it from filesystems you care about, and you don't care about other people.
They're only dropping it from their deprecated 1990s-era filesystem.
And yet they are not dropping support for that filesystem without encryption, which is why Apple is literally doing what you said they are not doing. Not only can't you handle more than one button, you also can't handle more than one idea.
No, SOME users want that unrestricted free-for-all.
Moving the goalposts. Get a real argument.
This is the fantasy of a child.
And a coward, to boot. Fixing things is hard, burning everything down is easy, but then comes the regret
Sadly, the cheats and the pirates are going to force Irdeto's hand and end up disabling games that were previously playable in Proton.
False. Their changes won't prevent Denuvo from being broken again, so there is no hand-forcing, just a lot of them using that hand to jack off.
If we want things to improve we have to make a responsible choice sometimes and not choose our base desires to blow everything up and then throw our hands up and question why we're surrounded by ashes.
We don't, though. Some of us do, but many want things to not just stay the same but go backwards, to a time when they personally were doing better... or thought they were.
Companies do not depend on nitpicking with peer reviewers. They could just do their thing, or they publish some insights.
Companies make press releases. Sometimes they are disguised as papers. "Do their thing" means "do stuff which makes money", that's the only reason they exist.
Proton doesn't commit back to Wine, Codweavers adopt commits from Proton
Codeweavers helps develop Proton.
Have a think about how forks work before you call someone else's comments bullshit.
Have a think about how Proton is developed before you talk more bullshit.
OM NOM NOM BOOTS
SEE SIG
From Google
You mean from the lowest, public-facing tier of Google's clanker?
Then STOP voting for the demo/rino you idiots!
So that we don't even get to decide which kind of lube will be used? Great fucking plan there, sparky.
Just detecting that there's now an open circuit where a diode should be would be fairly trivial and cover the cruder drilling cases; but this will be cosmetic at best against any moderately motivated tampering.
I really don't understand how Slashdot even attracts the kind of person who, knowing nothing about a subject, writes a comment about it without even looking it up. What exactly is the draw for you?
"If the mind is an ocean, as the paper's authors write in their opening line
It isn't. It's a mind. Trying to compare it to an ocean is stupid touchy feely shit.
Anthropic researchers have identified an internal activation subspace, J-space, that acts as a functional digital equivalent to the human brain's global workspace.
Global workspace theory uses the metaphor of a theater, not an ocean. They should pick a lane.
Truth is free, but information costs.