Whatever, maggot. Cry about left wing news reporting on the same thing when Sinclair stations are literally reading the same text online. You child rape enthusiasts are all the same.

That's not a good argument. Intel on what people are doing is something being produced. The problem isn't that AI isn't productive. It's capitalism. The benefits will be used to oppress humanity. The luddites were right.

Irrelevant

Ducking autocorrect, I meant shortage

I just saw a thumbnail for a video about one earlier today. It has a fan in it, too. That way there won't be any storage of oxygen for the fire :)

Until we look at what the specific sites are we can't determine whether the characterization was accurate, or whether they are false flag sites. No firm opinion either way yet.

If he's selfish then he's probably a rapeublican

If they can't get a rocket then why are we worried about Iran getting a nuke?

It's also not true. He's a Nazi because he's a Nazi. His parents had Nazi connections, they clearly raised him to be a piece of shit, and he clearly did two Nazi salutes in a row on stage with a face full of hate and then claimed it was about love. Yeah, he loves being a Nazi.

It's pretty easy if you whitelist at the harness. Anything else is irresponsible.

If we're going to have an AI safety law, it should include making it clear that people who don't whitelist and the AI gets out should be held accountable for the software's actions. Such a law might be mostly meaningless but at least that is important.

The AI can't access anything on its own so it should be pretty easy to institute a whitelist.

That is not how anything works. That is not what that word means. Until you figure this out you're going to spend a lot of time talking nonsense.

It's not legal to make it illegal to get AI services or products from China. We have a legal system for preventing exports for security reasons, but not for preventing the imports. It would take a lot more than writing some laws to make that happen. They can't credibly both claim their models are the best and we have to ban Chinese models for safety, that might fly with maggot cultists but it won't work for business leaders in the same way that ordinary Faux News tells lies from dusk 'til dawn, but Fox Business News gives accurate information because otherwise businesspeople won't watch it.

Things are worse in the USA than in most of Europe AFAICT, because we have such very low standards for drivers, which in turn is due to allowing a conspiracy of automakers, oil companies, and related industries to destroy working and often profitable mass transportation systems in order to produce revenues. We literally went backwards in public transport in this country on behalf of that conspiracy, the members of which were actually convicted in court. They then fined them $5 a piece and allowed them to continue.

So here, driving is essentially a right, insofar as our nation even believes such things exist. Specifically, it's a right enjoyed by the general public until it's more profitable to deny an individual that right.

It might seem that way if you don't know what capitalism is.

You are so close.

All you have to understand is that capitalism means one thing, which is that capital controls the means of production.

Massive consolidation is an obvious consequence of capitalism, and abuse of consumers is an obvious consequence of that consolidation. That's why antitrust law exists, but it is not capitalistic. Antitrust law is the opposite of capitalism. And that's why it's not being enforced meaningfully any more — because capital controls that, too.

It seems to work like this: Anarchy leads to feudalism leads to any of a number of inefficient systems lead to capitalism leads to failure as the capital eventually takes control and breaks everything. The only question is where you go from there. Will it collapse all the way back to feudalism, or even anarchy? The former is much more likely than the latter. A number of authors predicted techno-feudalism, including Neal Stephenson and Margaret Atwood.

I don't agree. It doesn't have to be intelligent to be dangerous. Nobody has made a self-replicating AI attacker yet because it's hard to hide, because it's big. But as more AI crap gets deployed it will be easier to hide more AIs among them.