Dying after something is not the same as dying from something. They can be unrelated. Whether those kids existed and died after vaccination isn't the only thing that could be false.

There are also very good reasons why deaths would go up which had nothing to do with COVID. Hospitals are breeding grounds for resistant pathogens AND an opportunity for people to spread illness to others.

It's cancer with forced induction giving higher volumetric efficiency, I guess

MuH TaX DoLLARS uRBLE DURrBLE etc.

Learn to Google if you weren't paying sufficient attention to have experienced Trump's flap about transgender mice. It was literally a thing

It's also more hazardous for children.

"The purpose of the infringing use (must be transformative, which this is);"

No, that's not all purpose means. It's also whether it's for educational purposes, ior for critique, which are both valid reasons; or for profit, which is not. And since this whole presidency is a grift, there is undoubtedly a profit motive.

You're talking about the opposite side of the relationship. You literally couldn't be any further off topic and still be covering the same subject.

What that says is that most of the OTA viewers at both high and low income levels average over 50... So yes, it's old people

Also prosecute the person who clicked the button that launched the attack. They should have known better.

Being expected to press any button not required to operate the vehicle is bad. It might not be very bad but there's no reason you should be paying to be harassed.

It's dumber than that. They have just been supporting this system all their life and they think that smart people don't make such big mistakes, and they think they're smart, so they couldn't have made such a big mistake. But none of that is how anything works...

A lot of people thought their insurance would cover everything and then they wound up paying over 100k for a heli ride to a hospital.

You say there's no case but your example valid uses didn't apply here, it's nice when bullshit is obviously self-contradictory, thanks for that

"they've excluded Google chatbots from this, likely because Google penalizes companies that show different search offerings to its bots versus actual human visitors."

Google has always claimed they did this in general but many of the top search results are obviously doing this. You go to the page and what showed in the summary isn't there at all.

Yes. He'll probably send ice to deport the transmitters