But at least the USA is not built for the entire public transit life
Look, I know this is tempting to believe, but it's nonsense. We had functioning passenger rail to almost everywhere and shut it down for profit-seeking reasons.
Just what IS it with the GOP's obcession with silencing Talarico anyway.
If you would pay even the slightest amount of attention you would know that Rapeublicans only hold office today because of the mobilization of the religious reich, so the answer to your question is beyond obvious. I know thinking about religious people is distasteful, but you're going to have to do it anyway.
That is not what I was referring to, but thanks for trying.
So what? He answered your question accurately, I think, unless Crockett instead decided to ask why the Epstein files haven't been released. And frankly that's the only thing anyone should say any time a Rapeublican opens their face. They should say "Hey rapeublican, why hasn't your child raping president permitted the release of the Epstein files, is it because they prove he rapes children?"
There is one exception. If that Rapeublican is Cheeto Benito, then they should say "Hey Trump, you child rapist, why haven't you released the Epstein files, is it because they prove you raped children?"
That's twice in this discussion you've dodged supporting your claim that Kimmel didn't offer equal time to other candidates with exactly the same C&P. You're a piece of shit.
You're thinking too small. If such an event were broadcast (globally), you can bet country after country would be phoning the US to renegotiate their tariffs and whatnot
You mean like they're doing now? I can't tell if you're wholly ignorant, trolling, or doing a psyop. No matter which, fuck off.
If the USA is seen to be actively destroying political rivals
If? Clown shit.
We have a lot of virtue signaling with things like electric vehicles.
True that. Driving is fun and cool but you know what else is fun and cool? Watching scenery go by while sitting on a train going 80. If you started from scratch with today's resources there's no way you would build cars to serve the bulk of people, it would just sound insane right on its face. "So, for 8 billion people to get around, we could build a handful of cars for remote areas and move most of them around using rail, which is very clean and efficient, or we could just do it all with cars and buses for a hundred times as much money and none of the efficiency."
You know what the absolute most insane car-like thing is though? BRT. "We could use this space to put in rail, but instead we'll build two more warming-increasing highway lanes and run a bus on them occasionally."
Know what else makes [Rapeublicans] mad?
Any second they spend breathing without their dick in a child?
They are, along with all of the other humans.
If you replace ALL of the humans then the problem is a lot simpler because you don't have to care about human needs.
AI techbros are barely human so they don't see the relevance
You're malfunctioning again, we're talking about biology, not computer science. Time to retrain your LLM.
Don't forget LG! Their TVs are listening to you when you're in a different room!
You should care because they are in the way of fixing the problem
No replies, only down mods.
As ever my detractors are cowards.
Prove me right again.
[citation needed]
Put up or fuck off, liar
Trump's a Dick Sucker? You really want to bring that up again? Did you ever figure out if he sucked off Bill Clinton, a billionaire, or a horse?
Not as comical as the progression from "we support oppressed peoples everywhere" to "we think the oppressors should have nuclear weapons"
You failed to observe the "Obama made a nuclear deal with Iran which Trump tore up and then tried to negotiate back again" phase of the argument. Whoops!
Happiness is a hard disk.
