Again, so Jared Isaacman is doing a good job but, Elon thought he would be good so ... Crimes.
Cool, so, that would be true for any person highly involved in the Space industry. So, we should only get the opinions of those that have nothing to do with NASA about the next NASA Administrator? Or, is it colored vision?
That said, you are going to get voted up for stating that even though previously they got all the contracts based on being awesome, once Trump got in and they got the same contracts it is sus. Then when called out, "forest for trees" bullshit.
Same is same bro. You don't have to love Trump or Elon to clearly see that SpaceX is the cheapest and most capable space program in existence currently. They single handedly lowered the cost to put stuff in orbit Pre SpaceX $90,000 / Kg to LEO. Now, Falcon 9 charges $2,800 per, Starship is set to smash even that. Anytime they do not get the contract and could have done it, someone is paying more for a launch that is done with a craft with a lower safety rating than the Falcon 9. So, you have to ask (Other than cases designed to keep launch capability DIVERSE) who got paid off.
There is no reason to ask for Space X. Because the reasoning is simple. They have an excellent record of doing what was said to be impossible. Doing it safely and at an extremely low price.
It's all good though, this is Slashdot after all. Nothing but numbers and facts, Guaranteed to be modded -1 Troll in 10 min.
When you see it. You will know that points here mean nothing if there is any hint of politics. Every Anti Trump even that has no info gets modded up and everything that does not hate when hate can be done is modded down.