You're trying really hard to be overly pedantic. Everyone who isn't suffering from Aspergers knows what was meant by the statement.
Apparently you don't. There's nothing wrong with the title.
Define "a lot" in hard numbers and do provide the methodology at which you came at that number.
At least he's no Jerry Yang!
The full story says the CEO declined the offers.
The CEO, Eric Migicovsky refused both offers.
Go back to bed, gramps.
LOL cold fjord posting as AC to defend himself again.
If it's safer than the alternative legal drugs why shouldn't it?
Hey, wank-stain, that's not the UK site.
UK site version. Thanks for playing.
Perhaps if you weren't so far up your own shitter, you'd know the difference.
Both sites have the exact same article. So what is supposed to be the difference?
Furthermore, fcuktard, it's also hidden deep in the "tech" section, where no one but dweebs would look - not on the front page where the nation would find it, twat. Add to that you had to find it, you knew about it first, smeg for breath.
Those goalposts sure are flying down the pitch. Keep flailing though.
You seem to think I support mass surveillance. I don't.
And yet your posts in this thread say otherwise.
I think there are better, more honest ways of dealing with Islamic terrorism.
Sure you do:
Mass surveillance is a necessary consequence of mass immigration from the Muslim world.
Strange selective memory you have there.
You're attempting to strawman.
Nope, just using your own words. To quote you:
That's not really a sensible attitude. The scale of violence that's possible with 400 terrorists is enormous.
Except it's not as actual facts play out. In 2015, just in the UK alone, there were 6 times as many people murdered by non-terrorists as there were people killed by terrorists in all of Western Europe.
Now trying to defend yourself by using AC posts? LOL!
Not to mention the fact that Muslims are widely over represented in the crime stats across Europe.
Disc space -- the final frontier!